On Tuesday 29 June 2010 05:43:49 pm Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
> I am curious - what is your MPLS L3 VPNs running on ?
> (if you provide such)
It's two different companies - I just happen to spend time
at both :-). Translated: different operations.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
On 29 June 2010 09:31, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 03:10:07 am Christopher E. Brown
> wrote:
>
>> That only works until aq high $$$ customer starts
>> demanding 9000byte payloads for their IP in vrf or VPLS
>> service...
>
> We run two networks - one for IP Transit, another for
>
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 03:10:07 am Christopher E. Brown
wrote:
> That only works until aq high $$$ customer starts
> demanding 9000byte payloads for their IP in vrf or VPLS
> service...
We run two networks - one for IP Transit, another for
national Metro-E (different companies, so don't thin
On 6/23/10 7:41 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 June 2010 08:31:03 pm Peter Rathlev wrote:
>
>> We generally use the highest supported MTU (often 9216
>> bytes) on all internal links, in an effort to make an
>> eventual transition easier later.
>
> We initially considered this, but when
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 08:31:03 pm Peter Rathlev wrote:
> We generally use the highest supported MTU (often 9216
> bytes) on all internal links, in an effort to make an
> eventual transition easier later.
We initially considered this, but when some platforms talk
9,216 bytes, others talk 9,
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 10:27:24 pm Oliver Boehmer
(oboehmer) wrote:
> Hmm, IGP/LDP sync addresses a different issue than
> GR/NSF? I would consider either "IGP/LDP sync" or "LDP
> session protection" (either one or both) to be best
> practices.. I personally find LDP session protection
> m
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:49 -0500, cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote:
> > 2) OSPF timers or BFD? Currently my approach has been ospf timers of
> > 1/4, its fast and seems pretty compatible with everything I have
tried
> > it on. All of my links are direct between routed ports so there are
no
> > i
Hey,
> > 1) IGP LDP Sync. I am really looking for some
> > direction as to where it makes sense or not to use. The
> > same is also true for the IGP LDP startup delay timers.
>
> We don't use it - we instead use IETF Graceful Restart for
> LDP and IS-IS.
Hmm, IGP/LDP sync addresses a dif
Please find my comments inline.
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:49 PM, wrote:
>
>> Good morning everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> If I may have a moment of your time, I'm approaching a small MPLS
>> deployment
>> (L3 VPN functionality only, no TE or L2VPN) on existing infrastructure
>> primarily 6500's & ASR1k
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:49 -0500, cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote:
> 2) OSPF timers or BFD? Currently my approach has been ospf timers of
> 1/4, its fast and seems pretty compatible with everything I have tried
> it on. All of my links are direct between routed ports so there are no
> intermediat
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 10:49:34 pm
cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote:
> 1) IGP LDP Sync. I am really looking for some
> direction as to where it makes sense or not to use. The
> same is also true for the IGP LDP startup delay timers.
We don't use it - we instead use IETF Graceful Restart
Good morning everyone,
If I may have a moment of your time, I'm approaching a small MPLS deployment
(L3 VPN functionality only, no TE or L2VPN) on existing infrastructure
primarily 6500's & ASR1k's and would very much like the opinion of the list
on some best practices. There are several techno
12 matches
Mail list logo
