Hi Jan,
Not. I already tried set interface Dialer3 instead of the next-hop. :/
Thanks,
Ray
On 8. Sep 2010, at 14:47 Uhr, Jan Gregor wrote:
Hi,
glad that first part worked. I would suggest change the PBR route-map to
set interface Dialer3. Maybe that helps, maybe not :).
Best regards,
That example is matching on IP address (rather than protocol), but I see some
differences in what I've been doing. Will try it as soon as I get a chance.
Thanks,
Ray
On 7. Sep 2010, at 22:18 Uhr, Roger Wiklund wrote:
Check this link out,
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1498451
Hi,
glad that first part worked. I would suggest change the PBR route-map to
set interface Dialer3. Maybe that helps, maybe not :).
Best regards,
Jan
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Davis wrote:
Thanks for the help!
I tried my previous test config again except with this difference...
ip
Thanks for your test config! The main thing I see different here is that you
have two default routes. In my case, the default needs to be the sdsl
interface and only http/https should go out the vdsl interface.
I get the routing to work, but NAT doesn't work going out the vdsl interface.
Thanks for the help!
I tried my previous test config again except with this difference...
ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
deny tcp any any eq www
deny tcp any any eq 443
deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.7.0
Check this link out,
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1498451
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Ray Davis ray-li...@carpe.net wrote:
Thanks for the help!
I tried my previous test config again except with this difference...
ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
deny tcp any any eq
Hi,
access-list 110 remark * ACL route-map RerouteWebTraffic *
access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq www
access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 443
route-map sdsl permit 10
match ip address NAT_Exempt
ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0
Here is the NAT order of operations in a Cisco router:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml#topic1
I just put something together in the lab, not sure if this is what you
want to accomplish, but it works like this:
interface FastEthernet0/0
Here is the NAT order of operations in a Cisco router:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml#topic1
I just put something together in the lab, not sure if this is what you
want to accomplish, but it works like this:
interface FastEthernet0/0
Which means that SNMP will never be NAT:ed on Fa0/1.
Typo :) Should of course be ICMP.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Roger Wiklund co...@xy.org wrote:
Here is the NAT order of operations in a Cisco router:
Hi y'all,
Got a customer router (2801, IOS 12.4(15)T10) with two upstream interfaces.
Both need to do NAT (private IPs inside). One is the default route, the other
should be used for web traffic. After trying various configs, I got rerouting
web traffic out the 2nd interface working, but
11 matches
Mail list logo