FYI, multihop is supported today and the configuration you have mentioned
is totally valid
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Ryan West wrote:
> Output of FCoE to a server? Currently multihop FCoE is not supported, but
> connecting to a CNA in that topology is.
>
> Sent from handheld
>
> On Mar 1
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000 convert between FC and FCoE?
Output of FCoE to a server? Currently multihop FCoE is not supported, but
connecting to a CNA in that topology is.
Sent from handheld
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:01 PM, "Ray Van Dolson" wrote:
> We'
As long as the John Chambers tax is paid. Oops, I mean licensed properly.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/nx-os/licensing/guide/Cisco_NX-OS_Licensing_Guide_chapter1.html
Michael Balasko
CCSP,CCNP,MCSE,SCP
Network Specialist II
City of Henderson
240 Water St.
Henderson, N
This works fine with the 5K.
Phil
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> Basically looking at sending FC to the Nexus, and having the Nexus
> re-emit that traffic bundled as FCoE out another port to a Converged
> Network Adapter.
>
> Ray
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:24:15PM
Basically looking at sending FC to the Nexus, and having the Nexus
re-emit that traffic bundled as FCoE out another port to a Converged
Network Adapter.
Ray
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:24:15PM -0700, Ryan West wrote:
> Output of FCoE to a server? Currently multihop FCoE is not
> supported, but co
Output of FCoE to a server? Currently multihop FCoE is not supported, but
connecting to a CNA in that topology is.
Sent from handheld
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:01 PM, "Ray Van Dolson" wrote:
> We're looking to run straight FC from an XIV storage rack into a Nexus
> 5000 and output FCoE via anot
We're looking to run straight FC from an XIV storage rack into a Nexus
5000 and output FCoE via another port on that same 5000.
Can anyone advise if this is doable or if we'd need additional hardware
to make it happen?
Thanks,
Ray
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hi,
Am I missing something or Nexus 5000 is unable to do policing on ethernet ports?
As far as I can see, the only similar option is bandwidth command
(under class type)
but it will not do policing, instead it will guarantee the given
bandwidth, (which is ok
if you want to share the available bw b
no
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Manu Chao wrote:
> Is the Nexus 5000 Fabric Manager Server License required for FEX N2K
> support?
>
> Thanks
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-n
Is the Nexus 5000 Fabric Manager Server License required for FEX N2K
support?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
010 4:53 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000 / Nexus 2000 SFP+ with LRM
On 10/05/2010 08:34, Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
> LRM SFP+ is just part of the stuff you need. For LRM to work, the
> switch linecard must have appropriate EDC functionality. If it's not
>
On 10/05/2010 08:34, Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
> LRM SFP+ is just part of the stuff you need. For LRM to work, the switch
> linecard must have appropriate EDC functionality. If it's not there, it simply
> won't work.
To give some back-ground on this, LRM is long-reach multimode. As it's
multimode, m
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 09:51:39AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Well, SR _are_ "supported" in SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 when used in CRS-1,
> SCE8000 and ASR1000, just not uBR10k.
I have to partially correct myself here. I can personally testify that
they are supported in ASR1000 (see also Release Notes IO
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:34:05AM +0200, Marian ??urkovi?? wrote:
> LRM SFP+ is just part of the stuff you need. For LRM to work, the switch
> linecard must have appropriate EDC functionality. If it's not there, it simply
> won't work.
Interesting. Thanks.
> > On a similar topic, I'm still waiti
On Sun, 9 May 2010 22:17:11 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 07:01:48AM +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
> > i doubt anyone has successfully deployed it as LRM is not supported on N5K
or N2K.
> > there are technical reasons behind why its not supported.
>
> Could you elaborate on tha
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 07:01:48AM +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
> i doubt anyone has successfully deployed it as LRM is not supported on N5K or
> N2K.
> there are technical reasons behind why its not supported.
Could you elaborate on that?
On a similar topic, I'm still waiting for an explanation,
On 07/05/2010, at 9:43 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> Has anyone successfully run Nexus 5000s and Nexus 2000s with 3rd party
> 10Gbase-LRM SFP+?
> (LRM SFP+ is not supported from Cisco (yet?)).
i doubt anyone has successfully deployed it as LRM is not supported on N5K or
N2K.
there are te
Has anyone successfully run Nexus 5000s and Nexus 2000s with 3rd party
10Gbase-LRM SFP+?
(LRM SFP+ is not supported from Cisco (yet?)).
TIA,
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
ar
Has anyone gotten VMware ESX 3.5 Update 4 to recognize the Qlogic
QLE8042 CNA with both the 10G Ethernet interface and FC HBA? We're
trying to get the server with the CNA installed connected to the Nexus
5000 and while the Ethernet interfaces are shown as up on the N5K, the
VFC interfaces are stuck
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:28:03AM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> How did you get your ASR1002 to link at 100M?
[...]
> This port has a GLC-T in it, and is plugged into a 100M Port on an
> ME3400... I can't get it up. :-)
I just discovered:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr1000/quick/st
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:28:03AM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> How did you get your ASR1002 to link at 100M?
This might be related to this thread:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-December/056829.html
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- d...@ircnet
> It's an SFP port rather than a copper 10/100/1000.
> Every Cisco SFP port fiber or copper is 1g only.
Not true. The GLC-T can do 10/100/1000 in some platforms but it is highly
platform and software dependent and I wouldn't rely on the Cisco website to
give you the right information.
B.
___
lf Of Church, Charles
Sent: Monday, 11 May 2009 09:39
To: Matthew Huff; Will Hargrave
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?
This URL sums it up pretty well:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compa
tibility/matrix/OL_6981.html#wp108824
How did you get your ASR1002 to link at 100M?
I've been pulling my hair out trying to get that to happen, with no
luck at all.
GigabitEthernet0/0/2 is down, line protocol is down
Hardware is 4XGE-BUILT-IN, address is 0025.4578.2902 (bia
0025.4578.2902)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100 Kbit,
d...@beanfield.com (Dan Armstrong) wrote:
> How did you get your ASR1002 to link at 100M?
Easy - the 3560 on the other side only has FE ports.
Apart from that: Plug and play.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.ne
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> I'd say most Cisco devices will be able to use GLC-T's on 10/100/1000.
I must admit, the only place I've encountered the "1000-only"
situation is on WS-X6724-SFP (and I assume 48-SFP) 6500 series line
cards.
Apart from here and the Nex
mh...@ox.com (Matthew Huff) wrote:
> Thanks. It appears that some of the fixed configuration switches that have
> SFP ports can be 10/100/1000. I've never run into that, as all the SFP ports
> I've seen on the 6500/7600 are fixed at 1G. I thought it was a SFP thing, but
> apparently not.
Well.
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Huff
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:21 PM
To: Will Hargrave
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?
Thanks. It appears that some of the fixed configuration switches that have SFP
ports can be 10/100/1000. I've
anville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139
-Original Message-
From: Will Hargrave [mailto:w...@harg.net]
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:27 PM
To: Matthew Huff
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
Matthew Huff wrote:
> It's an SFP port rather than a copper 10/100/1000. Every Cisco SFP port fiber
> or copper is 1g only.
Not true.
E.g. on a c3750g
ap-c3750g-1#show int status
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type
Gi1/0/6 ap-974aconnectedt
On 07/05/2009, at 7:48 AM, Matthew Huff wrote:
It's an SFP port rather than a copper 10/100/1000. Every Cisco SFP
port fiber or copper is 1g only.
Annoyingly, the current Nexus 2000 FEX box (2148T) offers GigE only
copper ports (1G-BASE-T via RJ45) which is a real shame as it's a nice
wa
Ah. Makes sense.
--Original Message--
From: Matthew Huff
To: Charles Wyble
To: Jay Ford
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?
Sent: May 6, 2009 2:48 PM
It's an SFP port rather than a copper 10/100/1000. Every Cisco SFP port fiber
or copper is 1g
ssage-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Wyble
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:05 PM
To: Jay Ford
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?
>- no 10/100; copper Ether is 1G only
Why? Can't t
- no 10/100; copper Ether is 1G only
Why? Can't the silicon do 10/100/1000? I mean that is what most kit is
sold as right?
I mean granted many folks have 1gbps ports on their kit but it
almost seems like they go out of there way to avoid the 10/100
compatibility.
On 5/6/09 1:39 PM, "Michael Balasko"
wrote:
> My understanding is that the current 5K line will NEVER do L3,
> but someone more internal to Cisco can confirm/rebuff that statement.
This is true. Nexus 5000 is a low latency cut through switching
architecture. High performance and low price pe
ailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:43 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?
It sounds like you aren't using FC through them, so I'm guessing they
were
positioned as a high density, low cost 1
The other con to deploying N2K/N5K today is that they don't yet support port
channeling of 1G connections down to the hosts which is sometimes common for
Oracle RAC clusters or VMware ESX environments. This will be resolved when
they start supporting virtual Port-Channels in the N5K series sometime
I've deployed a couple of 5020s with 2148ts because I need the 10Gb port
density (for low-latency communication between a lot of 10Gb servers and
for aggregation of 1Gb ports). I don't know enough of your client's
requirements to say whether this is the right choice for them, but one
potential
On Wed, 6 May 2009, ChrisSerafin wrote:
I have a client that Cisoc is recommending the Nexus line of switches for
their data center. They will be using IBM blade switches and I'm guessing
these would be the 'core'.
They are looking at (2) Nexus 5010's and (2) Nexus 2000's.totaling 60K.
I'
time.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "ChrisSerafin"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:45 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?
I have a client that Cisoc is recommending the Nexus line of switches for
their data center. They will be using IBM blade switches and I'm guessing
I have a client that Cisoc is recommending the Nexus line of switches
for their data center. They will be using IBM blade switches and I'm
guessing these would be the 'core'.
They are looking at (2) Nexus 5010's and (2) Nexus 2000's.totaling 60K.
I'm wondering why this would be recommended
Did you try www.cisco.com?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9670/data_sheet_c78-461802.html
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message --
From: Alex Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wasn't expecting this
Alex Howells wrote:
> Wasn't expecting this, particularly.
>
> http://www.xchangemag.com/hotnews/cisco-unveils-nexus-5000-series.html
>
> Does anyone have hot gossip, pictures or further information? A few of
> the other rags like El Register have picked up the news already but seem
> to be wo
Wasn't expecting this, particularly.
http://www.xchangemag.com/hotnews/cisco-unveils-nexus-5000-series.html
Does anyone have hot gossip, pictures or further information? A few of
the other rags like El Register have picked up the news already but seem
to be working from a very limited amount o
44 matches
Mail list logo
