Thanks JP. The newer code allows LAG A/A. To your last point we'll be
testing Config-Sync next week.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:13 AM, JP Velders j...@veldersjes.net wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:44:36 -0700
From: manderson chief...@gmail.com
Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 5k dual sup design
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:44:36 -0700
From: manderson chief...@gmail.com
Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 5k dual sup design
Hello, we currently use a single sup design in one of our DC's and we're
playing w/a dual sup design for single homed servers in our other DC.
Cisco A/S, our SE, and myself
On 26-May-13, at 8:13 AM, JP Velders j...@veldersjes.net wrote:
However, a dual-homed FEX does _not_ allow for LAGs downstream (to
dual home a server in active/active mode), at least on the 1st gen
FEXes we have, and that stupidity (together with all the STP
limitations) has steered me
Hi,
config-synch is your friend here. it provides a knob to duplicate certain
configs (namely vpc related bits) across n5k chassis to reduce the number of
touchpoints for the access-layer configuration.
its pretty handy at times, though its worth playing with in the lab to
understand how
Yes I guess Enhanced FEX is the official name for it. I've just always
referred to it as a dual-sup design.
I like your idea of using another switch.
Thanks
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Nick Adams nanogrea...@agitated.netwrote:
Evening,
You're talking about an Enhanced FEX when you
can use basically half as many 2k's hanging off each 5k.
3
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
manderson
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:33 PM
To: Mike Hale
Cc: cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5k dual sup design
S
The alternative would be to leave them on the existing 65oo infrastructure.
I agree, if you're single-homed your application is lame!
These are really good arguments! I really appreciate it.
Thanks
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Chris Marget ch...@marget.com wrote:
What's your
hanging off each 5k.
3
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
manderson
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:33 PM
To: Mike Hale
Cc: cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5k dual sup design
S
orry, dual sup meaning each 2k
On May 24, 2013, at 1:35 AM, Friedemann Stoyan wrote:
On 23.05.13 22:15, Mike Hale wrote:
Ahhh, gotcha.
I've got no experience with that as of yet. We're putting in 8 2248s
pretty shortly which I was going to dual-home for redundancy, but that
project is still in the early stages. I'd
On 23.05.13 22:15, Mike Hale wrote:
Ahhh, gotcha.
I've got no experience with that as of yet. We're putting in 8 2248s
pretty shortly which I was going to dual-home for redundancy, but that
project is still in the early stages. I'd also love to hear what
other folks have experienced with
Can you clarify by what you mean by dual-sup?
The 5k is single sup only isn't it?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:44 AM, manderson chief...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, we currently use a single sup design in one of our DC's and we're
playing w/a dual sup design for single homed servers in our other DC.
The 5K definitely only has a single SUP like Mike said...are you talking
about FEX's that are dual-homed to two 5k's?
Oliver
-
Oliver Garraux
Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:36
S
orry, dual sup meaning each 2k is dual homed to each 5k.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you clarify by what you mean by dual-sup?
The 5k is single sup only isn't it?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:44 AM, manderson chief...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahhh, gotcha.
I've got no experience with that as of yet. We're putting in 8 2248s
pretty shortly which I was going to dual-home for redundancy, but that
project is still in the early stages. I'd also love to hear what
other folks have experienced with this kind of setup.
On Thu, May 23, 2013
14 matches
Mail list logo
