Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

I'm running & connecting Mikrotik Router with dot1.q Vlan Trunking to catalyst without any problem. rgs a. rahman isnaini r.sutan - Original Message - From: "Harry Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:36 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:38:14PM +0800, Dracul wrote: >> Has anyone tried to integrate a non-cisco product using the standard >> dot1.qinto a cisco VLAN config? > > The nice thing about standards is that this should "just work". > > We've used this in a number o

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

Hi, On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:38:14PM +0800, Dracul wrote: > Has anyone tried to integrate a non-cisco product using the standard > dot1.qinto a cisco VLAN config? The nice thing about standards is that this should "just work". We've used this in a number of combination, and as long as you are

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

303) 467-4671 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:12 AM To: Dracul Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO On 04/01/2008, at 9:

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On 04/01/2008, at 9:01 PM, Dracul wrote: > Hi Tom, > > You're correct. The other VLAN1 is used for internet > > On Jan 4, 2008 5:09 PM, Tom Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > > > On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: > >> inte

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

Hi Tom, You're correct. The other VLAN1 is used for internet On Jan 4, 2008 5:09 PM, Tom Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > > > On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: > >> interface FastEthernet0/14 > >> switchport trunk encap

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On 04/01/2008, at 8:09 PM, Tom Storey wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > >> On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: >>> interface FastEthernet0/14 >>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>> switchport trunk native vlan 100 >>> switchport mode trunk >>>

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 08:09:46PM +1100, Tom Storey wrote: > I was about to ask if he could get away with running it as an access > port, but he spcifically mentioned trunking, so I was of the > impression that he needed both VLANs trunked to the box. I've got a load of Amino STB's in the offi

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: >> interface FastEthernet0/14 >> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >> switchport trunk native vlan 100 >> switchport mode trunk >> switchport nonegotiate >> end >> >> There are two VLANs u

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:40 +0800, Dracul wrote: > The Amino STB is using the standard dot1.q config and when connected to an > HP switch using the same trunking its ok. its now with the cisco that we are > getting problems. here's the cisco config > > interface FastEthernet0/14 > switchport trun

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: > interface FastEthernet0/14 > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport trunk native vlan 100 > switchport mode trunk > switchport nonegotiate > end > > There are two VLANs used in the network VLAN 1 and VLAN 100. what we are > lookin

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

Hi harry and simon, thanks for your inputs. when the Amino STB was used with an HP switch using dot1.q config, it worked fine but when doing an integration with cisco equipment it failed to do so. On Jan 4, 2008 4:36 PM, Harry Callahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As many others, I've been usin

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

Thanks Tom, The Amino STB is using the standard dot1.q config and when connected to an HP switch using the same trunking its ok. its now with the cisco that we are getting problems. here's the cisco config interface FastEthernet0/14 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vl

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 03:38:14PM +0800, Dracul wrote: > I am trying to integrate an AMINO STB (used for iptv) to a cisco > dot1.qtrunk. any thoughts on this? I'm not aware that the Amino STB supports dot1q. Simon -- Simon Lockhart | * Sun Server Colocation * ADSL * Domain Registration * Dire

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

As many others, I've been using linux 802.1Q capabilities for years without issues, and afaik AMINOs is linux based. On Jan 4, 2008 8:38 AM, Dracul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone tried to integrate a non-cisco product using the standard > dot1.qinto a cisco VLAN config?I am t

Re: [c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

On 04/01/2008, at 6:38 PM, Dracul wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone tried to integrate a non-cisco product using the standard > dot1.qinto a cisco VLAN config? > I am trying to integrate an AMINO STB (used for iptv) to a cisco > dot1.qtrunk. any thoughts on this? > > regards, > chris Im sure there

[c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

Hi all, Has anyone tried to integrate a non-cisco product using the standard dot1.qinto a cisco VLAN config? I am trying to integrate an AMINO STB (used for iptv) to a cisco dot1.qtrunk. any thoughts on this? regards, chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list c