On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 12/24/2010 11:22 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
>
>> Did you forget to set next hop self on the rr's? Also, you didn't
>> mention if there were any routes in the bgp table.
>>
>
> Why would you want to set next-hop-self on an RR?
Good point. I
On 12/21/2010 05:07 PM, Jimmy Changa wrote:
I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream
routers (routerb and routerc). The 3 routers have full IPv6 BGP tables,
however if I look at routerA's routing table, there are not BGP routes in
it. While I can see the route fo
On 12/24/2010 11:22 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Did you forget to set next hop self on the rr's? Also, you didn't
mention if there were any routes in the bgp table.
Why would you want to set next-hop-self on an RR?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@
Did you forget to set next hop self on the rr's? Also, you didn't mention if
there were any routes in the bgp table.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Jimmy Changa wrote:
> I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream
> routers (routerb and router
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 00:23 -0500, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> So none of the routes are being installed on RouterA from the BGP
> table into the RIB? all the routes are marked as RIB failure in the
> BGP table of RouterA?
If this is the case then "show ip bgp ipv6 unicast rib-failure" should
give the re
[adding the list]
So none of the routes are being installed on RouterA from the BGP
table into the RIB? all the routes are marked as RIB failure in the
BGP table of RouterA?
I remember there being a debug that will show you why a route isn't
installed into the routing table from BGP, but I can't
Yes, pingable also ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> Random guess, but are the BGP next hops reachable by the RR?
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jimmy Changa
> wrote:
>> I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream
>>
Random guess, but are the BGP next hops reachable by the RR?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jimmy Changa
wrote:
> I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream
> routers (routerb and routerc). The 3 routers have full IPv6 BGP tables,
> however if I look at routerA'
I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream
routers (routerb and routerc). The 3 routers have full IPv6 BGP tables,
however if I look at routerA's routing table, there are not BGP routes in
it. While I can see the route for say, ipv6.google.com, the router says it
has
