Hi,
> Not if the person making the buying decision is not the engineer who
> gets to deploy the product in the end. Hence "time to market“ and
> "requirements“ in Powerpoint.
If it were up to just the operational people we'd still be driving
horseless carriages with a driver high up front.
On 10 February 2016 at 09:45, Antoine Monnier
wrote:
Hey,
> I am wondering what is the driver for this
> running-for-latest-feature-while-code-is-unusable approach?
> surely customers are not asking for that, are they? should customer
> requirements not be the main
Hi, all,
> Am 10.02.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Antoine Monnier :
>
> (sorry keyboard issues)
>
> I am wondering what is the driver for this
> running-for-latest-feature-while-code-is-unusable approach?
> surely customers are not asking for that, are they? should customer
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Antoine Monnier wrote:
> thanks Nick for the feedback (and sorry for hijacking this thread)
>
> I am still quite frustrated with the number of issues with that line of
> switch considering that it has been introduced 3 years ago now... Is that
> the
emy Bresley
> Cc: cisco-nsp NSP
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
>
> In our environment, with QoS applied on the LAN (classification, marking,
> queuing, etc) we have had quite a few issues with the 3850 deployed at the
> access-layer, mainly centered on QoS. We are
> Gert Doering
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:39 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Antoine Monnier wrote:
> > thanks Nick for the feedback (and sorry for hijacking this thread)
> >
> > I am still quite frustrated with the number of issues with that line
> > of switch
I
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
> > Gert Doering
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:39 AM
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Antoine Monnier wrote:
> > > thanks Nick for the feedback (and sorry for hijacking
I
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Antoine Monnier wrote:
> I
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Adam Vitkovsky > wrote:
>
>> > Gert Doering
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:39 AM
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:45:05AM +0100, Antoine Monnier wrote:
> (sorry keyboard issues)
>
> I am wondering what is the driver for this
> running-for-latest-feature-while-code-is-unusable approach?
> surely customers are not asking for that, are they? should customer
> requirements not be
(sorry keyboard issues)
I am wondering what is the driver for this
running-for-latest-feature-while-code-is-unusable approach?
surely customers are not asking for that, are they? should customer
requirements not be the main drivers?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Antoine Monnier
of the new AC AP's.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Antoine
Monnier
Sent: 08 February 2016 07:56
To: Jeremy Bresley
Cc: cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
In our environment, with QoS applied on the LAN
de | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc.
>> O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | mack.mcbr...@viawest.com |
>> www.viawest.com
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
>> John Gaffn
On 05/02/16 15:45, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>> > Though, I've not seen anything mentioned in regards to the newer 3650/3850.
> These have double amount of shared memory compare to what 2960S/3560X have
Good to know!
--
Tom
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
] Output drops on 2960
On 05/02/16 15:45, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>> > Though, I've not seen anything mentioned in regards to the newer 3650/3850.
> These have double amount of shared memory compare to what 2960S/3560X
> have
Good to
.@viawest.com>, "Nick Cutting"
<ncutt...@edgetg.co.uk>, "Tom Hill" <t...@ninjabadger.net>
Cc: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
We do have a few of those out the in field and they are
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Cutting
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 11:00 AM
To: Tom Hill <t...@ninjabadger.net>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
I use this list for switch buffers - seems pretty accurate to me:
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
This looks like a great guide.
Looks like I'll be working to replace the switch with something with more
power. Any body have a recommendation for a switch with some bigger buffers and
2x 10G uplinks? Need at least 12 Gig ports
: Mack McBride [mailto:mack.mcbr...@viawest.com]
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 1:37 PM
To: John Gaffney <jgaff...@nan.com>; Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.co.uk>; Tom
Hill <t...@ninjabadger.net>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
4948Es are
least 12 Gig ports.
>
>Thanks,
>
>John
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
>Cutting
>Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 11:00 AM
>To: Tom Hill <t...@ninjabadger.net>
>Cc: cisco-nsp@puck
To: John Gaffney <jgaff...@nan.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
Hey John,
> Switch is a straight layer 2, no layer 3 functionality short of mls qos and
> some dscp mutation. Anybody seen this kind of thing before? Any commands that
> ma
; Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.co.uk>; Tom Hill
<t...@ninjabadger.net>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Output drops on 2960
4948Es are pretty good if you need 10/100/1000.
They are also relatively cheap and can be bought used at a good discount.
If you don't need 10/100 t
On 05/02/16 13:48, John Gaffney wrote:
> Not sure if I am looking at some microbursts, but it would seem to me
> the weak buffers in the thing cannot handle bursty traffic? We have
> dealt with microbursts before, but the switch is hardly doing 50% of
> the interface.
It's been discussed a number
Hey John,
> Switch is a straight layer 2, no layer 3 functionality short of mls qos and
> some dscp mutation. Anybody seen this kind of thing before? Any commands that
> may help point me towards why these drops are happening? Anybody ever fatten
> the q's on these things?
Turning on 'mls
Hey guys,
got a old 2960s that is registering some output drops on the show interface
counters. Odd thing is the actual traffic load on the interfaces that are
dropping is between 10-50% on 30 second interval. Not sure if I am looking at
some microbursts, but it would seem to me the weak
24 matches
Mail list logo