Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for cutting in into this thread but from the responses looks like my question would fit here too. We are about to provide a customer with a price for upgrading one of the STM-1 ISP links to an STM-4 link with a 200 Mb port. The router we have

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread Robert Boyle
At 02:43 PM 9/18/2008, David Aldworth wrote: We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI. The first is SONET and the second is ATM. Other than

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 18 September 2008 14:43:19 David Aldworth wrote: > We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 > VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In > researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI. > The first is SONET and the secon

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread sthaug
> We are about to provide a customer with a price for upgrading one of the > STM-1 ISP links to an STM-4 link with a 200 Mb port. The router we have > in place is a 7206 VXR NPE G1. What card would be suitable in this > router to do the trick? I can't find an OC12 card using the > configurator. Th

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread nasir.shaikh
haikh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 19 september 2008 9:07 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI >> Yep. The PA-MC-STM-1: >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/c

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Jr. > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 12:12 AM > To: David Aldworth > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI >

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-19 Thread marco
>> Yep. The PA-MC-STM-1: >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2033/ps2762/product_data_sheet09186a008007d6c0.html > > This card looks like it's more at home on the Europe side of the pond, > i.e. handling STM1s, and breaking service down to E1s. You're absolutely right, of cour

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Rubens Kuhl Jr.
PE-1CHOC3-SMIR-QPP PIC for the Juniper M7i, perhaps ? Rubens On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, David Aldworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. > Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this > there

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Marco van den Bovenkamp wrote: David Aldworth wrote: Hmm. Okay, so the PA-MC-T3 breaks the DS3 down to individual DS1's (T1's). Is there nothing equivalent at the OC3 level? Yep. The PA-MC-STM-1: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2033/ps2762/product

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Paul G. Timmins
That card handles E1s, not T1s. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco > van den Bovenkamp > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:26 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Paul G. Timmins
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Aldworth > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:58 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI > > So the below config will get break the OC3 into DS3's but to > get from > ea

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Marco van den Bovenkamp
David Aldworth wrote: Hmm. Okay, so the PA-MC-T3 breaks the DS3 down to individual DS1's (T1's). Is there nothing equivalent at the OC3 level? Yep. The PA-MC-STM-1: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2033/ps2762/product_data_sheet09186a008007d6c0.html Regar

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread David Aldworth
orth Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:18 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI A vendor suggested the following configuration: 15454 Chassis and Fan Dual TCC+ cards Dual Cross Connect Cards 1 DS3 card (12 DS3s) 1 DS3 backplane (24

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Paul G. Timmins
id Prall > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI > > A vendor suggested the following configuration: > > 15454 Chassis and Fan > Dual TCC+ cards > Dual Cross Connect Cards > 1 DS3 card (12 DS3s) > 1 DS3 backplane (24 DS3 Back

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread David Aldworth
mber 18, 2008 2:43 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Colin Whittaker
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 01:07:20PM -0600, David Aldworth wrote: > Hmm. Okay, so the PA-MC-T3 breaks the DS3 down to individual DS1's > (T1's). Is there nothing equivalent at the OC3 level? The PA-MC-STM-1 does it for stm-1 and E1 circuits. not sure if there is an OC3 version > > David > > On

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread David Prall
iner > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI > > Hmm. Okay, so the PA-MC-T3 breaks the DS3 down to individual DS1's > (T1's). Is there nothing equivalent at the OC3 level? > > David > > On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Ju

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Natambu Obleton
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI. The first is

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Aldworth wrote: Hmm. Okay, so the PA-MC-T3 breaks the DS3 down to individual DS1's (T1's). Is there nothing equivalent at the OC3 level? Not on a 7200, that I'm aware of. jms ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.neth

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread David Aldworth
Hmm. Okay, so the PA-MC-T3 breaks the DS3 down to individual DS1's (T1's). Is there nothing equivalent at the OC3 level? David On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Aldworth wrote: We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread David Prall
a MUX in front of it. David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Aldworth > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:43 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] PA-POS-

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Aldworth wrote: We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI. The first is SONET and the second is ATM. Other tha

Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread Dave Weis
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Aldworth wrote: We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI. The first is SONET and the second is ATM. I am pret

[c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI

2008-09-18 Thread David Aldworth
We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200 VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI. The first is SONET and the second is ATM. Other than price what is the difference? Which is n