Re: [c-nsp] PfR

There are two distinctly different PFR features. Pfr2. Circa 2010-present used automate IPsla probes and attempted to control protect and load balance traffic by adjusting route costs. It could also route specific traffic classes over different paths. Pfr3 is a much much different animal.

Re: [c-nsp] PfR

Cisco has put a lot of effort into this functionality in the last 2 years. I would suggest looking at IWAN: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Jan2015/CVD-IWANDesignGuide-JAN15.pdf Arie On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > On 24 March 2016 at

Re: [c-nsp] PfR

On 24 March 2016 at 18:34, Joel M Snyder wrote: > I designed it into a network of about 90 sites (global, not US) and it was > not a resounding success. The management was ugly, but more importantly it > just didn't play well with others and at some clear points wasn't

Re: [c-nsp] PfR

>Apart from cisco certifications, and Cisco Live seminars where it >seems PfR predominantly lives - has anyone actually used this in the >real world? I designed it into a network of about 90 sites (global, not US) and it was not a resounding success. The management was ugly, but more

Re: [c-nsp] PfR

On 24 March 2016 at 14:16, Nick Cutting wrote: Hey, > Apart from cisco certifications, and Cisco Live seminars where it seems PfR > predominantly lives - has anyone actually used this in the real world? > > We are getting more clients interested in recovering from "brown

[c-nsp] PfR

Apart from cisco certifications, and Cisco Live seminars where it seems PfR predominantly lives - has anyone actually used this in the real world? We are getting more clients interested in recovering from "brown outs" in the WAN, and I am wondering whether to look at specific SD WAN products,

[c-nsp] PfR between datacenters

Hey everyone! I have a couple of datacenters that run PfR between two providers per datacenter that simply load balances outbound traffic between two ASRs. We're looking at possibly removing one provider at each location and load balancing traffic between datacenters. I have redundant

Re: [c-nsp] PfR Seminar

Hi all , please check the image belowhttp://www.mediafire.com/?ab6wckakaobbjcrDoes the videos for this seminar exist anywhere? BR, Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:56:33 +0300 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PfR Seminar From: ko...@korio.org To: gunner_...@live.com CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Hi

Re: [c-nsp] PfR Seminar

Hi , Thanks for the replyThe videos are for the old seminar , I want the new ones :) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:56:33 +0300 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PfR Seminar From: ko...@korio.org To: gunner_...@live.com CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Hi, On Wed, June 26, 2013 12:36 pm, M K wrote

[c-nsp] PfR Seminar

Hi all Does anyone know where the video sessions for the below link are?http://blog.ine.com/2013/04/20/pfr-vseminar-topology-and-initial-configurations/ Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] PfR Seminar

Hi, On Wed, June 26, 2013 12:36 pm, M K wrote: Hi all Does anyone know where the video sessions for the below link are?http://blog.ine.com/2013/04/20/pfr-vseminar-topology-and-initial-configurations/ Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] PfR Seminar

http://www.ine.com/all-access-pass/training/playlist/ccie-rs-pfr-vseminar/-pfr--vseminar-22200011.html Scroll down for other parts On 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, M K wrote: Hi all Does anyone know where the video sessions for the below link

[c-nsp] PFR opinions

Are you or any of your large customers running PFR? If so, have experiences been positive or negative? Thanks, Dave _ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

prefix or traffic type. -- http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:20 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question IN SCENARIO BOTH LINKS FROM SAME

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:20 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question IN SCENARIO BOTH LINKS FROM SAME SERVICE PROVIDER -But how will this avoid drops when PE1and CE1 link goes down as MPBGP bring secondary path as best in BGP table ( MPLS

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

for a particular prefix or traffic type. -- http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:20 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question IN SCENARIO BOTH LINKS

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

I believe the feature that should match your requirement are 1. To counter IOS deficiency where BGP is not event-driven, use BGP Selective Address Tracking - introduce in 12.4(4)T, 12.2(33)SRB http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/ip_route/configuration/guide/brbadv.html 2. To install backup

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question IN SCENARIO BOTH LINKS FROM SAME SERVICE PROVIDER -But how will this avoid drops when PE1and CE1 link goes down as MPBGP bring secondary path as best in BGP table ( MPLS domain )and then to routing table will take atleast 3 min

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

25, 2010 8:50 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question Hi David, In a multipath instance PE1 will install the Equal Cost route with rd 1:1 first, using 1:2 as a secondary path only. Opposite on PE2.??? whne both paths have equal cost

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

dear guys, is my mail being delivered to group as no one replied. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Network champs, I'm stuck in understanding of PFR . Docs say it converges in 3 sec ( for realtime traffic VOICE )... I understand you can send

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jack daniels Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:35 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question dear guys, is my mail being delivered to group as no one replied. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, jack

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

[mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jack daniels Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:35 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question dear guys, is my mail being delivered to group as no one replied. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, jack

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question But if you have -- |CE1PE1 PE3CE3 X.X.X.X-| MPLS DOMAIN- -- | CE2PE2 PE4

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:41 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question Hi David , thanks man I got the basic idea :) 1) but please

Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question

...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:41 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Question Hi David , thanks man I got the basic idea :) 1) but please explain in more detail

[c-nsp] PFR Question

Hi Network champs, I'm stuck in understanding of PFR . Docs say it converges in 3 sec ( for realtime traffic VOICE )... I understand you can send traffic out secondry link but what about traffic which has to come back from remote end ( for which SP has not converged). But if you have --

[c-nsp] PFR

So I see Cisco has just announced PFR. Has anyone here worked with it already? Thoughts? Bugs? Is it the major improvement over OER that it's made out to be or just lipstick on a pig? Is it worth considering over one of the route optimization appliances on the market? Thanks, Andrew