On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
If your 3825 router is having a hard time taking care of the load, I
would recommend you look at a 7201 (or at an older 7301).
I appreciate the responses from all. I am testing Poptop, but am
having some interoperability issues wit
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PPTP devices
since all the pptp traffic gets process switched, Cisco would not meet
the
feasibility condition on Router; if i were you i will use a linux (Intel
Core 2 Duo,4 Gig Mem) box running poptop (http://www.poptop.org/) for
such
a huge and
mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote:
> since all the pptp traffic gets process switched, Cisco would not meet the
> feasibility condition on Router; if i were you i will use a linux (Intel
> Core 2 Duo,4 Gig Mem) box running poptop (http://www.poptop.org/) for such
> a huge and increasing number of pptp us
since all the pptp traffic gets process switched, Cisco would not meet the
feasibility condition on Router; if i were you i will use a linux (Intel
Core 2 Duo,4 Gig Mem) box running poptop (http://www.poptop.org/) for such
a huge and increasing number of pptp users.
Regards,
Masood
Blog: http://we
Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:
I'm in the unfortunate position of having to support a bunch (100 or
so now, 300 or so very soon) PPTP connections.
Right now I'm using a 3825, and based on CPU performance it looks like
I'll be lucky to get 200 on this thing with my typical end use usage
patterns.
I'm in the unfortunate position of having to support a bunch (100 or
so now, 300 or so very soon) PPTP connections.
Right now I'm using a 3825, and based on CPU performance it looks like
I'll be lucky to get 200 on this thing with my typical end use usage
patterns.
Cisco seems to be prett
