Re: [c-nsp] PVLAN Question

2011-01-12 Thread Sam Evans
Just wanted to take a moment and say thanks. Your suggestion worked beautifully. Thank you again! On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:32 PM, schilling schilling2...@gmail.com wrote: promisc port has to be access port. So you need a loopback cable on your access switch with two vlan numbers for your

Re: [c-nsp] PVLAN Question

2011-01-12 Thread Pavel Skovajsa
Actually there is a feature for this - switchport private-vlan trunk , but as far as I know it is only working on the C4500-ME sup http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.1/12ew/configuration/guide/pvlans.html

[c-nsp] PVLAN Question

2011-01-11 Thread Sam Evans
All, I am trying to do a PVLAN implementation on one switch in a distribution / access switch environment. Ideally, I'd like to just be able to use the 'isolated' command but we have a few devices that will need to talk to port neighbors, so the PVLAN community would work well. My challenge

Re: [c-nsp] PVLAN Question

2011-01-11 Thread schilling
promisc port has to be access port. So you need a loopback cable on your access switch with two vlan numbers for your primary vlan. For example vlan 140 and vlan 141, then your link to distribution will still be vlan 140, 252 trunk, but one end of loopback cable would be access vlan 140, the other