i've been bitten by that on this platform with other feature sets as
well; ie, IPSec, it'll let you configure the whole phase1 & phase2
components but will not do anything really.
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--
On 3/8/11 12:14 PM, Lobo wrot
Thanks Phil! You're right about it not being support...silly that it
still let's you configure things but that's another argument.
I've managed to police the vlan like this now:
class-map match-any test
match any
!
policy-map test
class test
police cir 300
conform-action transm
On 08/03/11 15:43, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 08/03/11 15:33, Lobo wrote:
I've configured "mls qos vlan-based" on the two physical interfaces
just like we do on our 3750s. ME-6524 is running 12.2(33)SXH6 Advanced
IP Services. Not sure what else I can do considering that the specs
state that this fe
On 08/03/11 15:33, Lobo wrote:
I've configured "mls qos vlan-based" on the two physical interfaces
just like we do on our 3750s. ME-6524 is running 12.2(33)SXH6 Advanced
IP Services. Not sure what else I can do considering that the specs
state that this feature is support on this platform.
Ar
Anyone?
Jose
On 3/4/2011 3:52 PM, Lobo wrote:
Hey everyone. I've been trying to replicate the per-port per vlan
policing that we do on our C3750s on an ME-6524 we have in our lab but
I'm coming across a rejection by the router/switch whenever I attempt
to apply the policy-map to the SVI.
T
Hey everyone. I've been trying to replicate the per-port per vlan
policing that we do on our C3750s on an ME-6524 we have in our lab but
I'm coming across a rejection by the router/switch whenever I attempt to
apply the policy-map to the SVI.
This is the configuration I'm using:
mac access-l
