I have a question, I have over 50 vlans and each needs to be policed at
different speeds. I have a cat 6509 with sup32's
Creating access-lists, class maps etc. are no issues for me. To my
understanding that I can only police in one direction on any given interface.
So I put a service-policy
ford
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Paolo Lucente
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Hi Paolo,
Let me just summarize the scenario maybe it was not clear.
Find below a short depiction.
(Internet)---Cat3750
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill ford
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Paolo Lucente
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Hi Paolo,
Let me just summarize
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Hi Paolo,
Let me just summarize the scenario maybe it was not clear.
Find below a short depiction.
(Internet)---Cat3750---(L3 Etherchannel)Cat6500
Customer
Planning to apply bandwidth restriction(policing) on the L3
.
954-298-1697
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill ford
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Paolo Lucente
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Hi Paolo,
Let
the policer kciks in. Is there any way to
smooth things out?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paolo Lucente
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 5:14 AM
To: Bill ford
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Guys,
Need your help on this...
Here is the scenario:
We have a Catalyst 6509 with Sup 720+Policy Feature Card 3 connected to the
Internet gateway Switch (catalyst 3750G). We are running Layer 3 etherchannel
between the Cat 6509 and Cat 3750G.
We need to restrict the bandwidth
Hi Bill,
1)
i would recommend you to police ingress traffic from the customer
and shape egress traffic to the customer. This gives you several
benefits including ease of configuration your side (limited to the
6509 box only) and smooth congestion management.
If it's an un-managed CE solution
Hi Paolo,
Let me just summarize the scenario maybe it was not clear.
Find below a short depiction.
(Internet)---Cat3750---(L3 Etherchannel)Cat6500Customer
Planning to apply bandwidth restriction(policing) on the L3 Etherchannel
between 3750G and Cat 6500. Maybe this will clear up
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Paolo Lucente
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Hi Paolo,
Let me just summarize the scenario maybe it was not clear.
Find below a short depiction.
(Internet)---Cat3750---(L3 Etherchannel)Cat6500
.
954-298-1697
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill ford
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Paolo Lucente
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Hi Paolo,
Let me just
To: Fred Reimer; Paolo Lucente
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Policing Question
Thanks Guys..
So seeing the rough diagram depiction and Etherchannel
between the Cat 3750 and Cat 6500, is it right to assume
that Police will be applied to Etherchannel out direction
12 matches
Mail list logo
