Subject: Re: [c-nsp] QOS on asr901
Hi,
ASR901 has a very odd qos implementation due to the fact it's based on a
stock-standard Broadcom chip. From my experience - only basic stuff actually
works (regardless of what docs say). On a single port you can effectively have
only one egress p
Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On-Behalf-Of: pshe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] QOS on asr901
Message-Id:
Recipient: adam.atkin...@damovo.com
Recipient: darren.coll...@damovo.com
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
ASR901 has a very odd qos implementation due to the fact it's based
Hi,
ASR901 has a very odd qos implementation due to the fact it's based on a
stock-standard Broadcom chip. From my experience - only basic stuff
actually works (regardless of what docs say). On a single port you can
effectively have only one egress policy (regardless of the number of the
EVCs you
ubject: Re: [c-nsp] QOS on asr901
Hi Adam, I am out wine tasting but I can give you some pointers later, IIRC
the priority % command automatically police's to that %. I have a document
that you could probably get your hands on if you poke your account manager in
the right way which expla
share with you myself..
Cheers,
Caillin
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Vitkovský Adam"
To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Subject: [c-nsp] QOS on asr901
Date: Sat, Jun 21, 2014 1:54 AM
Hi folks,
I'm just evaluating asr901 and came across some QOS i
Hi folks,
I'm just evaluating asr901 and came across some QOS issues.
Anyone using egress QOS with priority and random-detect discard-class-based on
ASR901 please?
I'm getting so many errors and limitations.
Had to strip the priority queue config to basically this:
class core_realtime
prio
