Hank Nussbacher wrote:
And to repeat - to the best of my knowledge the 3825 can't take 1GB of
RAM and therefore is not an optimal solution for small multihoming. -Hank
Yes it can, table 2 here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016a8e8.html
or
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 07:17:14PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday 14 November 2008 17:14:00 Magnus Eriksson wrote:
>
> > Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today
> > only seems to be used for ASRs. Is IOS XE something that
> > is gonna be built upon by Cisco moving ahead? I don
Magnus Eriksson wrote:
Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today only seems to be used
for ASRs. Is IOS XE something that is gonna be built upon by Cisco moving
ahead? I don't wanna be stuck with a "dead" OS.
Clarification: from what I can see, IOS XE is only used on the ASR 1000
You'll need the ESP either the 5/10G too. *thinks*
IOS consistency it's something which most of us are keeping our
fingers crossed even though there're consistent releases for the SR,
XE and XR codes. :)
I believe there're lots of folks wanting to knock ITD's door down and
the various BUs.
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Garry wrote:
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Garry wrote:
The 3825 can take 1GB? The Cisco ISR link doesn't show that.
Just checked again - I thought I had put 1GB in our FW-Router, but it's
"only" 768 at the moment (added a 512 to the stock 256) ... Anyway,
On Friday 14 November 2008 17:14:00 Magnus Eriksson wrote:
> Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today
> only seems to be used for ASRs. Is IOS XE something that
> is gonna be built upon by Cisco moving ahead? I don't
> wanna be stuck with a "dead" OS.
AFAIK, IOS XE was based on the
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Garry wrote:
>
> The 3825 can take 1GB? The Cisco ISR link doesn't show that.
Just checked again - I thought I had put 1GB in our FW-Router, but it's
"only" 768 at the moment (added a 512 to the stock 256) ... Anyway,
IIRC, the 3825 has two slots, phys
First of all, thank you all for your insights.
If we were to go with the ASR track I guess I'd need both the 1002 chassis
item (18k USD list price) and the 5k USD IP BASE license aswell. Am I
understanding that correctly?
Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today only seems to be use
And to repeat - to the best of my knowledge the 3825 can't take 1GB of RAM
and therefore is not an optimal solution for small multihoming. -Hank
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2008 13:09:58 Eric Cables wrote:
If you look at the interactive model (
http://www.ci
On Friday 14 November 2008 13:09:58 Eric Cables wrote:
> If you look at the interactive model (
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855
>/ps5857/prod_presentation0900aecd80543db9.html) you can
> see GE0/0 and GE0/1 interfaces.
>
> In addition, the data sheet for both the 3825 a
If you look at the interactive model (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/ps5857/prod_presentation0900aecd80543db9.html)
you can see GE0/0 and GE0/1 interfaces.
In addition, the data sheet for both the 3825 and 3845 indicates 2
10/100/1000 interfaces:
http://www.cisco.com/en
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Garry wrote:
The 3825 can take 1GB? The Cisco ISR link doesn't show that.
-Hank
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
But if you really need 100Mb/sec then a 3845 which can handle
256Mb/sec of thruput would be the next one that can handle 1GB.
Actually, 3825 would be the next one ...
IMHO, since we are now running both of Juniper & Cisco, for handling
huge of traffic (e.g Flooding) M5 still much better compared to 7206 VXR
a. r. isnaini rangkayo sutan
Rodney Dunn wrote:
I haven't looked at the price list.
How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
From a growth perspe
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
> The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of refresh.
i realize this is a cisco list, but the reason i make this suggestion
is that it'd be easier to copy your configuration to what's already junos
than port
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> But if you really need 100Mb/sec then a 3845 which can handle
> 256Mb/sec of thruput would be the next one that can handle 1GB.
Actually, 3825 would be the next one ... rated at ~170Mb/sec ... 3825
are nice, too with their dual GigE onboard ... we use a couple of them
for
I'm looking for some pointers on what are the smallest recommeded
Cisco
boxes to use for a small multihoming solution.
2 full BGP views (approx 260k routes each)
100 Mbps bandwidth requirement.
The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of
refresh.
What is the appropiat
If I didn't remember wrongly based on the list price, it's still
cheaper to get the G2 combo either on the 7201 or 7206 w/ the bundle
and the difference in cost is quite significant for some.
Unless Magnus sees that there's a need for the central forwarding
engine/esp or he sees that there'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rodney Dunn) wrote:
> I haven't looked at the price list.
>
> How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
In real-life prices in Germany the ASR1002/AdvEntSvc is some EUR 3K-5K
more expensive than a 7201/AdvIPSvc. No idea about a "real" combo.
Elmar.
__
I haven't looked at the price list.
How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
>From a growth perspective the ASR1002 would be what I would
consider giving a potential migration to GigE.
Rodney
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:52:47PM +0800, raymondh (NSP) wrote:
> You may want to consider getting ei
You may want to consider getting either part # CISCO7201 (PSU
included) or 7206VXR/NPE-G2 (you need to pay for the PSU, it's quite
cheap).
Both the part # for the box, shouldn't be much of a difference or same.
--raymondh
On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
I'm looking for
I'm looking for some pointers on what are the smallest recommeded Cisco
boxes to use for a small multihoming solution.
2 full BGP views (approx 260k routes each)
100 Mbps bandwidth requirement.
The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of refresh.
What is the appropiate C
21 matches
Mail list logo
