On 2/Jun/15 12:42, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> Good point. In our case though it's typically mobile data connections
> (mostly 3G) so the delay and potential packet loss means a local DHCP
> server was preferable.
>
> But generally a central DHCP is clearly a win. :-)
For folk doing distributed BNG's
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 11:32 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 02/06/2015 11:29, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > That's a fair argument. We use IOS routers as DHCP servers for some
> > remote locations where deploying a server would be overkill.
>
> dhcp relay is a win in this situation.
Good point. In ou
On 02/06/2015 11:29, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> That's a fair argument. We use IOS routers as DHCP servers for some
> remote locations where deploying a server would be overkill.
dhcp relay is a win in this situation.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
Hi Mohammad,
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 11:05 +0300, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> Usually I rely on DHCPD package on Linux distributions to configure my
> DHCP server , but the issue is that my client wants his MLS to do that
> job
That's a fair argument. We use IOS routers as DHCP servers for some
remot
Thanks all , clearer for me now
BR,
Mohammad
> From: ncutt...@edgetg.co.uk
> To: ncutt...@edgetg.co.uk; eng_m...@hotmail.com; pe...@rathlev.dk
> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Redundant DHCP Server
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:06:47 +
>
> That shoul
cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Mohammad Khalil
Sent: 02 June 2015 09:05
To: Peter Rathlev
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Redundant DHCP Server
Hi peter , thanks for the great reply :) Usually I rely on DHCPD package on
Linux distributions to co
cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Mohammad Khalil
Sent: 02 June 2015 09:05
To: Peter Rathlev
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Redundant DHCP Server
Hi peter , thanks for the great reply :) Usually I rely on DHCPD package on
Linux distributions to co
hosts only ?
Is there a way that I can make the DHCP assign addresses for the clients in a
round-robin fashion?
Thanks again
BR,
Mohammad
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Redundant DHCP Server
> From: pe...@rathlev.dk
> To: eng_m...@hotmail.com
> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Mon, 1
Hi Mohammad,
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 13:44 +0300, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> Sorry for the bad format
You did an okay-ish job of making it better. :-) But you should probably
consider using another mail client. Then you don't have to spend all
that time making your emails readable.
...
> Now , when
Sorry for the bad format
> Hi all
I am testing a redundant DHCP server with two MLS connected to an access switch
Two hosts are connected to the access switch and they are DHCP clientsWhat am
trying to do is to load balance the DHCP assignments and to avoid duplicate IP
address assignments ,
Hi allI am testing a redundant DHCP server with two MLS connected to an access
switch Two hosts are connected to the access switch and they are DHCP
clientsWhat am trying to do is to load balance the DHCP assignments and to
avoid duplicate IP address assignments , so I have configured the same D
11 matches
Mail list logo
