On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:19:20PM +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Has anyone real world experience of using these 2 features (Reflexive
ACLs or CBAC) on 6500 with MSFC2 (SUP2) or MSFC3 (SUP720)?
depends on your environment.
if you can limit the traffic that that would trigger the
Thanks Brian Roland,
I guess i'll stick with the ACLs then.
Imho, cisco should put out a warning when configuring these features.
Regards,
Tassos
Brian Stiff (bstiff) wrote on 27/1/2008 7:07 πμ:
Hi Tassos-
While YMMV, the IOS Firewall product management team has been
discouraging use of
On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
If i understand right (according do the documentation) both are
processed in software in the MSFC,
so that's going to hurt a little.
It has the potential to hurt a lot. I highly recommend that you not
do this if you're passing
Hi Tassos-
While YMMV, the IOS Firewall product management team has been
discouraging use of IOS Firewall Inspection (CBAC) on the Cat6K for some
time. For whatever reason, I can't locate the IOSFW EoL page, but
please have a look at a link from last year:
Has anyone real world experience of using these 2 features (Reflexive ACLs or
CBAC) on 6500 with
MSFC2 (SUP2) or MSFC3 (SUP720)?
If i understand right (according do the documentation) both are processed in
software in the MSFC,
so that's going to hurt a little.
Are there any hidden
