On Monday, April 11, 2011 07:10:34 PM Eric Van Tol wrote:
Yes, we will do pretty much the same thing. It's what
we're doing now for non-v6 enabled switches and seems to
work. Traffic load on v6 is low, so static tunnels to
routers are not a big deal at the moment.
Aye.
The only issue is
On Monday, March 14, 2011 07:08:20 PM Eric Van Tol wrote:
I tested the ME3600X a few months ago and it was
impressive, but the lack of IPv6 (really?!)...
Yes, no native v6 on Day One is a pain. But we knew this
when the box was being developed. Cisco have continued to
insist that basic v6
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 9:02 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Replacement for 3550-12T being used as a router
- IPv6 related
Hi everyone.
We're looking at some kind of replacement for our 3550-12Ts which are
currently being used as the routers at our edges. Since these are
layer 3 switches, there are also some vlans that transit through the
device but realistically they don't have to. It's just how I inherited
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Lobo loboti...@gmail.com wrote:
Considering we need some new, cheap router/layer3 switch that can:
- police at least 128 customers
- run OSPFv3
- support a fair amount of routes
- support dual stack IPv6
- need at least 4-6 Gig interfaces
would you have
:30 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] Replacement for 3550-12T being used as a router - IPv6 related
Hi everyone.
We're looking at some kind of replacement for our 3550-12Ts which are
currently being used as the routers at our edges. Since these are
layer 3 switches, there are also some vlans
Can it handle 100-120Mbps of traffic though? I thought this platform
was limited to something well below that?
Jose
On 3/10/2011 10:57 AM, Andrew Wentzell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Loboloboti...@gmail.com wrote:
Considering we need some new, cheap router/layer3 switch that
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 11:30:27 pm Lobo wrote:
I asked Cisco and they recommended the ME3600X but this
product looks too new and full IPv6 support is not even
ready yet (as per their response).
If you're willing to wait, v6 support will come to the
ME3600X/3800X around Q3 this year (of
Thanks for the info Mark. We'll take this into consideration as well.
Jose
On 3/10/2011 9:01 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 11:30:27 pm Lobo wrote:
I asked Cisco and they recommended the ME3600X but this
product looks too new and full IPv6 support is not even
ready yet
