True, but check for feature parity beforehand. If you're just doing basic l2
then more than likely it's already there. But always check first
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
From: i...@st-andrews.ac.uk
To: darre...@outlook.com
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Replacing 3750X stack
Date: Sun
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lukasz
Bromirski
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 12:22 PM
To: CiscoNSP List
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Replacing 3750X stack
Why you say Cisco doesn't see any longevity for 4500X?
4500X is here to stay, as part of 4500 family, which itself is also here
Cisco me3600x/me3800x have great buffers, although lower port count.
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 10:50:09 +1030
Subject: [c-nsp] Replacing 3750X stack
Hi,
We have a 3750X stack (2
3850 also makes a good replacement for 3750s as they also stack and have
bigger, but still smallish, buffers
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
From: darre...@outlook.com
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Replacing 3750X stack
Date: Sun, 11
Why you say Cisco doesn't see any longevity for 4500X?
4500X is here to stay, as part of 4500 family, which itself is also here to
stay. Roadmap points far into future.
You can go ahead with 4500X deployments, or experiment with other metro
platforms - ME3600/3800 or even 6880.
--
./
On 2
Hi,
We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a
core switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, so
we are looking to upgrade them.
We run pairs of 4500X's (In VSS) at some other POPs, and are quite happy with
them, but Cisco dont
