I only have experience with Cisco WAAS but if you're on anything with
decent latency (10ms) they caused more (performance) problems for us than
they solved. For us the incremental cost of upgrading our bandwidth in most
locations was low enough that we didn't take WAAS out of the pilot (and we
: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saxon Jones
Sent: 09 August 2012 9:38 AM
To: harbor235
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Riverbed
I only have experience with Cisco WAAS but if you're on anything with decent
latency (10ms
Hi Dale,
why do you want to add the WAAS when you already have the riverbed, any
particular special reason, because as far as I know they do the sam thing,
WAN optimization.
The why would help us understand the how :-)
Raymond
On 9/21/07, Dale Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a
Hi Raymond,
It's complicated, politically (not technically). Essentially it's a
large enterprise environment and Riverbed has been deployed to a small
number of sites ( 5) as a pilot. There is now a requirement to deploy
WAAS to a small number of (different) sites.
Obviously though, at the
Hi all,
I have a curly scenario that some of you may be able to help with.
I have a situation where I need to add Cisco WAAS WAN optimisers to a
set of WAN links that already have Riverbed appliances installed
in-line.
I hope this turns out:
Data Centre:
..
| Server |
`'
