xport isnt?
From: Phil Bedard
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2018 6:15 AM
To: CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Route Leaking (GRT<-> VRF)
This is regular IOS? Be careful where you are sourcing the pings from, since
it's intermittent it could
This is regular IOS? Be careful where you are sourcing the pings from, since
it's intermittent it could be sourcing them from somewhere you aren't expecting
and doesn't have reachability between VRF/Global.
Phil
On 4/29/18, 6:30 AM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of CiscoNSP List"
wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
(Apologies in advance, rather long post)
Have setup a peering vrf to test route leaking (GRT<->VRF)
For the route leaking, added the following to two PEs (Both having a vrf
interface on them) vrf definition:
address-family ipv4
import ipv4 unicast 1 map RP_TEST_PREFIXES_GRT
expor
Hi,
Just testing route leaking between GRT+VRF using import+export ipv4 unicast -
From a PE, I am able to ping prefixes in the VRF and in GRT, but prefixes
learned from another PE(Also doing route leaking) are unreachable (Prefixes
that are part of the VRF (i.e not leaked prefixes) I can reach
