:* donderdag 17 februari 2011 8:40
*To:* Rens
*Cc:* Josh Baird; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation for small ISP
Hi Rens,
Actually there is no statement saying that but I believe this should be the
case soon, Cisco ASR1001 is a totally fixed device
no?
From: mounir.moha...@gmail.com [mailto:mounir.moha...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Mounir Mohamed
Sent: donderdag 17 februari 2011 8:40
To: Rens
Cc: Josh Baird; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation for small ISP
Hi Rens,
Actually
no?
From: mounir.moha...@gmail.com [mailto:mounir.moha...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Mounir Mohamed
Sent: donderdag 17 februari 2011 8:40
To: Rens
Cc: Josh Baird; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation for small ISP
Hi Rens,
Actually there is no statement
Mounir Mohamed mounirmoha...@gmail.com writes:
For investment protection I recommend Cisco ASR1001, It is an ISP class gear
that allows you to add services as you grow without performance degradation.
Check it out.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10878/index.html
I know I am repeating
It depends on the number of BGP sessions you gone use, multiple BGP sessions
with full internet routing table (340K right now) will be stored smoothly on
an RP with 4G or 8G memory, but after completing the BGP decision process it
will end up with less than 500k on the forwarding path (ESP5 with
On 17/02/2011 09:11, Mounir Mohamed wrote:
It depends on the number of BGP sessions you gone use, multiple BGP sessions
with full internet routing table (340K right now) will be stored smoothly on
an RP with 4G or 8G memory, but after completing the BGP decision process it
will end up with less
From a different angle, IPv4 depletion will defuse the increasing of IPv4
routes on the internet.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 17/02/2011 09:11, Mounir Mohamed wrote:
It depends on the number of BGP sessions you gone use, multiple BGP
sessions
On 17/02/2011 10:03, Mounir Mohamed wrote:
From a different angle, IPv4 depletion will defuse the increasing of IPv4
routes on the internet.
That may happen. Alternatively, as people become desperate about acquiring
new IPv4 address space in order to grow their businesses, they will buy /
On Feb 17, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Mounir Mohamed wrote:
From a different angle, IPv4 depletion will defuse the increasing of IPv4
routes on the internet.
Not necessarily.
---
Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net //
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 17/02/2011 10:03, Mounir Mohamed wrote:
From a different angle, IPv4 depletion will defuse the increasing of IPv4
routes on the internet.
That may happen. Alternatively, as people become desperate about acquiring
Thanks for the advice, everyone. Unfortunately, I am on a tight budget for
this particular project which is why I was looking at cheaper/smaller
solutions such as a 3845 or perhaps a 7206VXR with a NPE-G1. While these
are older products, they should be be able to satisfy my requirements for
the
On 17/02/2011 14:39, Josh Baird wrote:
While these are older products, they should be be able to satisfy my
requirements for
the short term, right? That is, they can handle two full BGP feeds.
Hi Josh,
A 7206VXR with a NPE-G1 and 1GB RAM kit will handle 2 full BGP feeds
comfortably.
It is
Hi,
I'm looking for a router recommendation for a very small ISP. The
router will terminate two ethernet circuits from two upstream ISPs - a
total of around 100mbit between the two ISPs. The router will have a
BGP session with each provider and should be able to handle full
tables from both.
For investment protection I recommend Cisco ASR1001, It is an ISP class gear
that allows you to add services as you grow without performance degradation.
Check it out.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10878/index.html
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Josh Baird joshba...@gmail.com wrote:
] Router recommendation for small ISP
For investment protection I recommend Cisco ASR1001, It is an ISP class gear
that allows you to add services as you grow without performance degradation.
Check it out.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10878/index.html
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Josh
Of Mounir Mohamed
Sent: donderdag 17 februari 2011 1:10
To: Josh Baird
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation for small ISP
For investment protection I recommend Cisco ASR1001, It is an ISP class
gear
that allows you to add services as you grow without performance
] On Behalf Of Mounir Mohamed
Sent: donderdag 17 februari 2011 1:10
To: Josh Baird
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation for small ISP
For investment protection I recommend Cisco ASR1001, It is an ISP class gear
that allows you to add services as you grow without
17 matches
Mail list logo
