No I did consciously post to a Cisco NSP mailing list because unlike
yourself there are many
top notch professional with varied experience on this list that also like
to help out.
Your posts are always thoughtful, nothing better to do I assume?
Mike
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Gert Doering
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 01:02:19PM -0400, harbor235 wrote:
> Can anyone clarify if hard bounce messages types can singularly be
> configured to soft bounce (e.g Soft_bounce=yes, postfix) or is it an all or
> nothing configuration change.
I'm fairly sure there is a Cisco solution to your probl
Hi Noggers,
Can anyone clarify if hard bounce messages types can singularly be
configured to soft bounce (e.g Soft_bounce=yes, postfix) or is it an all or
nothing configuration change.
Also, is there any definitive guide to improve your Internet mailer
reputation?
steps to correct, I am aware of
* Alexander Clouter [2010-03-15 16:53:12+]:
>
> [snipped]
>
> Hell, Turknet should be sending me some bottles of Raki for getting one
> of their /16's turned into a handful of /32 listings. :)
>
That was meant to be TurkTelekom and a /17...incase there is some Raki
out there for me :)
Che
Hi,
* Drew Weaver [2010-03-15 12:18:01-0400]:
>
> Entities such as Senderbase and UCEPROTECT don't even use WHOIS
> information so that point is irrelevant.
>
...entities such as ISP's and mail server administrators do maintain
their own lists too so I think stating the point is irrelevant is a
What is stopping service providers having a bunch of perl scripts that
daily check when IP's they are responsible for get listed? It should be
simply an extension of their NMS platform. Once you have detailed
WHOIS/PTR records you at least have something to point out to the
postmasters, and t
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alexander Clouter
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:05 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP
Mohammad Khalil wrote:
>
> we have a lot of our cus
Mohammad Khalil wrote:
>
> we have a lot of our customers that are uses SMTP servers other than
> our own server which causes the subnet to be black listed
>
My guess is that you are not cleanly labelling your IP space which means
the jobs of the people maintaining blacklists have no idea about
.net] Im Auftrag von
> Mohammad Khalil
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. März 2010 11:39
> An: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Betreff: [c-nsp] SMTP
>
>
> hi all
>
> we have a lot of our customers that are uses SMTP servers
> other than our own server
> which causes the subn
hi all
we have a lot of our customers that are uses SMTP servers other than our own
server
which causes the subnet to be black listed
we tried to block them from accessing any other SMTP server except our own
server using access lists on our core routers
it works fine but is that the optimal
- Original Message -
From: "a. rahman isnaini r. sutan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco NSP Puck Nether Net"
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection
: This could be done if the smtp server directly connected to the router.
: Anyway t
Hi,
On 8/16/07, a. rahman isnaini r. sutan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can i enable smtp redirection on a cisco router ?
> In other word, if any user send email to any destination their smtp setting
> will not be changed.
> And the packet then redirected to a smtp server.
I know you're loo
In addition to PBR, "ISG Layer 4 redirect" feature can also be used, but
platform support for ISG is rather limited (requires 12.2SB).
oli
a. rahman isnaini r. sutan <> wrote on Sunday, August 19, 2007 4:27 PM:
> This could be done if the smtp server directly connected to the
> router. A
t: Sunday, August 19, 2007 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection
:
: The packets from the SMTP client -> to the SMTP server, would not be
: translated by only using the PBR (match ip address 100, set ip next-hop
: 192.168.20.20) piece.
: I noticed that further down his email, Jorge men
Julio Arruda wrote:
> The packets from the SMTP client -> to the SMTP server, would not be
> translated by only using the PBR (match ip address 100, set ip next-hop
> 192.168.20.20) piece.
I seem to recall a convoluted example of SMTP interception (redirection)
by using SLB, essentially in reve
quot;Julio Arruda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection
>
>
> :
> : The traffic is being routed to the next-hop, but I would assume the
> : layer3 header information is not being changed, s
"layer3 header information is not being changed" > right !.
DNAT on the current gateway ?
:: a. rahman isnaini r. sutan
- Original Message -
From: "Julio Arruda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Red
without
> having any idea to which opened / specific tcp port.
>
>
> :: a. rahman isnaini r. sutan
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jorge Evangelista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 4:50 AM
> Subject:
Jorge Evangelista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection
:I have not tried it yet, but I think that you could try something like that
:
: Customers=192.168.10.0/24
: SmtpRelay=192.168.20.20
:
:
: !
: access-list 100 rema
ce static tcp o.o.o.o 25 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (mail server)
> 25?
> :: a. rahman isnaini r. sutan
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Kratzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Cc: "a. rahman isnaini r. sutan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17, 2007 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection
: On Thursday 16 August 2007 09:31:48 a. rahman isnaini r. sutan wrote:
: > what the config looks like ?
: > as the mail server is not located / directly connected to the router.
: >
: > tx
: >
: > :: a. rahman isnaini r. s
On Thursday 16 August 2007 09:31:48 a. rahman isnaini r. sutan wrote:
> what the config looks like ?
> as the mail server is not located / directly connected to the router.
>
> tx
>
> :: a. rahman isnaini r. sutan
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/12.html#topic8
___
D]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection
: On Thursday 16 August 2007 08:12:37 a. rahman isnaini r. sutan wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: >
: > How can i enable smtp redirection on a cisco router ?
: > In other word, if any user send email to any
On Thursday 16 August 2007 08:12:37 a. rahman isnaini r. sutan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> How can i enable smtp redirection on a cisco router ?
> In other word, if any user send email to any destination their smtp setting
> will not be changed.
> And the packet then redirected to a smtp server.
>
> This sm
Hi,
How can i enable smtp redirection on a cisco router ?
In other word, if any user send email to any destination their smtp setting
will not be changed.
And the packet then redirected to a smtp server.
This smtp redirection used generally in hotspot technology.
I tried to do this on PBR, unfo
25 matches
Mail list logo
