* Christophe Cardon; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> *Emne:* Re: [c-nsp] SXI(3) code status?
>
> i am also interested in a bug id. i am running the same setup, still
> version SXI1, but has been running fine.
> yet another thing for me on my to-do-list: verify this on sxi1
>
: Christophe Cardon; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Emne: Re: [c-nsp] SXI(3) code status?
i am also interested in a bug id. i am running the same setup, still version
SXI1, but has been running fine.
yet another thing for me on my to-do-list: verify this on sxi1
regards,
Geert
2009/11/20 Kevin Graham
i am also interested in a bug id. i am running the same setup, still version
SXI1, but has been running fine.
yet another thing for me on my to-do-list: verify this on sxi1
regards,
Geert
2009/11/20 Kevin Graham
>
>
> > Problem also with SNMP ACL bypass with SXI3 on VSS setup. If you
> configur
> Problem also with SNMP ACL bypass with SXI3 on VSS setup. If you configure
> ACL
> to protect access to SNMP RO or RW, the ACL is not filtering and access is
> granted to anyone (if you know the community string of course).
Ouch, will want to track this before moving off of SXH rebuilds an
).
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] På vegne af Murphy, William
Sendt: 18. november 2009 18:10
Til: andrew; Chris Phillips
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Jared Mauch
Emne: Re: [c-nsp] SXI(3) code status?
We have VSS
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 06:40:39 pm Daniska, Tomas
wrote:
> Which one that was? We've been hit by a bug when using
> TAC+ out of a VRF. Initial user authentication is OK, but
> the subsequent enable auth outgoing packets do not have
> the proper VRF set and go out the GRT instead. Funny
> e
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:39:44PM -0500, Tim Durack wrote:
> SXI3 has also removed "patching" ability:
>
> "Installer/patching capability is removed starting from some of the
> new images in SXI. Installer patching support will continue on SXH and
> SXF. For Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SXI3, ION patch
> Bill
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of andrew
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:29 AM
> To: Chris Phillips
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Jared Mauch
> Subject: Re: [c-
o-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of andrew
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:29 AM
To: Chris Phillips
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Jared Mauch
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXI(3) code status?
Breaks as in after forcing a sup switchover while on console
subsequent SSH connections are refused, as it seems t
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Cc: Jared Mauch
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXI(3) code st
We upgraded tonight one of our boxes to SXI3. The WS-X6324-100FX-MM works with
this version of code!
hth, Reinhold
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:51:01AM -0500, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
> I have been running the SXI(3) on a test router with 100M MM 6324, which it
> did not recognize in previous versio
Breaks as in after forcing a sup switchover while on console
subsequent SSH connections are refused, as it seems the private key is
missing/unreadable.
This is logged:
Nov 18 10:16:08.211: SSH2 0: RSA_sign: private key not found
Nov 18 10:16:08.211: SSH2 0: signature creation failed, status -1
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 11:31:18 pm Jared Mauch wrote:
> I strongly recommend using it over prior versions of SXI.
As part of our recent round of upgrades, we moved from SXH3
to SXI2a. It did fix a non-severe AAA bug we hit when we
first moved to SXH3.
If we'd waited 4 extra days, we'd hav
Define breaks. Breaks as in your ssh connection drops and you have to
login again, or breaks as in your ssh connection drops and the ssh
service doesn't restart?
andrew wrote:
Here is some BAD on SXI3 ...
with redundant supervisor, SSH breaks upon supervisor switchover.
-andrew
On Tue, Nov
Here is some BAD on SXI3 ...
with redundant supervisor, SSH breaks upon supervisor switchover.
-andrew
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
> The 6324 100 MM is supported but did not come online in SXI 1, 2 , 2A. It did
> however work in SXI, which we are running now.
>
> Th
The 6324 100 MM is supported but did not come online in SXI 1, 2 , 2A. It did
however work in SXI, which we are running now.
The other flavors are not supported.
Jeff
On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Release 12.2(33)SXH and later releases do not support the following hardware
Release 12.2(33)SXH and later releases do not support the following hardware:
These Ethernet Switching Modules:
–WS-X6024-10FL-MT 24-port 10BASE-FL MT-RJ
–WS-X6248A-TEL 48-port 10/100TX RJ-21
–WS-X6248-RJ-45 48-port 10/100TX RJ-45
–WS-X6248-TEL 48-port 10/100TX RJ-21
–WS-X6324-100FX-SM 24-por
Jared,
After quickly glancing at the release notes, I was unable to find
anything about the removal of hardware support for the 63xx series
cards. Do you have a URL or can you be more specific?
Thanks in advance!
Jared Mauch wrote:
SXI3 has a number of bug fixes for our network, including
SXI3 has a number of bug fixes for our network, including one that would cause
the next-hop to be populated as 'drop' in hardware.
I strongly recommend using it over prior versions of SXI.
Due to the removal of hardware support we replaced the older 63xx/62xx series
cards.
- Jared
On Nov 17,
SXI2a running fine with MPLS, QoS, SVIs (no BFD on those... :-(),
OSPF, BGP. PFC3C-only, no WAN cards/modules, no DFC.
Rubens
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
> I have been running the SXI(3) on a test router with 100M MM 6324, which it
> did not recognize in previous
I have been running the SXI(3) on a test router with 100M MM 6324, which it did
not recognize in previous versions, and so far no complaints but then again
it's not in a real world yet.
Does anyone else have GOOD or BAD new on SXI(3)?
Jeff Fitzwater
OIT Network Systems
Princeton University
21 matches
Mail list logo
