I'll suggest that Provider change the CSU/DSU since that all signals
are not open a syncronization problem can be there...
Rgds.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Marcelo Zilio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before?
> Link is UP and traffic is going through, howev
@adhost.com> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marcelo Zilio
> > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:04 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-
CTS isn't needed for synchronous serial so i thought? The only time you
would need clear to send is if you are asynchronous...or so i thought. My
impression was that those pins were not tied to anything typically. And the
wires would be tied back to DCD.
Not sure i'm correct, but logically I do
Cts is clear to send. It sounds like you have a physical problem with the
line.
On Dec 17, 2009 1:09 PM, "Marcelo Zilio" wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before?
Link is UP and traffic is going through, however router shows CTS=down
besides a lot CRCs/Input Errors.
It doesn'
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marcelo Zilio
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:04 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP
>
>
Hi,
Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before?
Link is UP and traffic is going through, however router shows CTS=down
besides a lot CRCs/Input Errors.
It doesn't make sense to me the parameter which should advise that the link
is "ready to go" is DOWN while there is traffic on it.
Users are
