:10:52 +1000
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Solution for 'DR' Site
From: and...@2sheds.de
To: oli...@g.garraux.net
CC: midoa...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote:
If it meets their needs, the simplest way would probably be to use
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Sanjeev Maniks midoa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your comment. At the moment the bank is already mirroring the
data between the primary and DR sites and have now requested that we not
provide any communication channel through our network for this purpose.
Hello,
I am new to this list and wanted some guidance on a Cisco solution for the
following requirement.
We have a client (bank) who have two sites - A and B - both located in
difference towns. A is the HQ and B is to be their Disaster Recovery (DR)
site. Client has requested for -
*
If it meets their needs, the simplest way would probably be to use separate
IP space at each site, with DNS based load balancing to fail their
applications over to the DR site.
Cisco's ACE is dead. Look at F5's products. Their GTM product (DNS based
load balancing) is solid and really flexible.
On 09/04/2013 00:12, Oliver Garraux wrote:
Cisco's ACE is dead. Look at F5's products. Their GTM product (DNS based
load balancing) is solid and really flexible.
Brocade ADX series are also worth looking at (previously: Foundry
ServerIron). Their smallbox will do 1G of LB, with options for
Well , If we have our own ip space , we can make use of BGP for failover .
Thanks
Ranjith
Sent from my iPad
On 09-Apr-2013, at 5:05 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 09/04/2013 00:12, Oliver Garraux wrote:
Cisco's ACE is dead. Look at F5's products. Their GTM product (DNS based
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote:
If it meets their needs, the simplest way would probably be to use separate
IP space at each site, with DNS based load balancing to fail their
applications over to the DR site.
DNS has nothing to do with load
