Though you using 2 different VTP domains/VLAN databases, are the VLANs
per business unit at least unique so the VLAN databases don't have
overlapping VLANs?
What's the purpose of interconnecting the 4 switches?
What are the connections between the 4 switches? access port (same vlan
on each
of the links.
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Sands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 9:36 PM
To: Aaron R
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Spanning-Tree question
Though you using 2 different VTP domains/VLAN databases, are the VLANs
per
Hi Guys,
Ive got a problem that I am hoping someone can have a look at. I currently
have four 3750's. Two belonging to one business unit and two belonging to
another. Each group of switches is running a separate VTP domain / VLAN
database.
I am running PVST however when I connect the final
-nsp] Spanning-Tree question
It should eventually go into a blocking state as the port still
participates in STP in portfast mode, this can take 30-50 seconds
though, not sure if you've left it that long?
On a side note, if you have Administrative control over both devices
this as the cpu went crazy @
like 90%.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Steele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:31 PM
To: Aaron R
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Spanning-Tree question
Hi All,
I've setup four switches for failover running PVST+. All the links between
switches are trunks and several VLAN exist on all switches. Spanning-tree
is blocking ports predictably and it's working, but since then I am getting
a high amount of unidirectional discards on the ports
