Re: [c-nsp] Static Virtual Tunnel Interface: No phase 2 proposal

2016-10-10 Thread eyeballi77
sorry Nick... omitted to include you on the reply. thanks again. On 7 October 2016 at 09:01, eyeballi77 wrote: > hello all... > > Hoping I can get some input on an issue I am having with the above. > > I have a ASR1002X as a PE that I am also trying to terminate a small > number of internet ba

Re: [c-nsp] Static Virtual Tunnel Interface: No phase 2 proposal

2016-10-07 Thread Nick Cutting
@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Static Virtual Tunnel Interface: No phase 2 proposal hello all... Hoping I can get some input on an issue I am having with the above. I have a ASR1002X as a PE that I am also trying to terminate a small number of internet based VTI's from C867vae CPE routers on VDSL/

[c-nsp] Static Virtual Tunnel Interface: No phase 2 proposal

2016-10-07 Thread eyeballi77
hello all... Hoping I can get some input on an issue I am having with the above. I have a ASR1002X as a PE that I am also trying to terminate a small number of internet based VTI's from C867vae CPE routers on VDSL/PPPoE links. As these are SVTI the encryption domain is always 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 CP