Re: [c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question

2009-04-09 Thread Geoffrey Pendery
Yes, failover shouldn't take 2-3 minutes. I've personally observed it as less than one second in several test environments. But I imagine it's highly dependent on the details. What it your criteria for measuring it as done? Are you pinging from a host on one port of the chassis to another?

[c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question

2009-04-08 Thread Paul Stewart
Hi there. We have 7606's with dual Sup720-3BXL. I'm investigating how to get the fastest possible failover if/when a supervisor fails. Current config looks like this: my state = 13 -ACTIVE peer state = 8 -STANDBY HOT Mode = Duplex Unit = Primary

Re: [c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question

2009-04-08 Thread Michael Lee
did you try enable nsf if it is possible? there are some limitation on mpls-te On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote: Hi there. We have 7606's with dual Sup720-3BXL. I'm investigating how to get the fastest possible failover if/when a supervisor fails.

Re: [c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question

2009-04-08 Thread David Prall
Of Paul Stewart Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:45 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question Hi there. We have 7606's with dual Sup720-3BXL. I'm investigating how to get the fastest possible failover if/when a supervisor fails