Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote on 19/01/2024 14:58: The pluggable optic must be DWDM 1530 to 1563 nm with QPSK modulation that fits 50Ghz (~31 to 35Gbaud) and a launch power of ZR+ 0dBm. The customer channel should have Rx: Max <-10 dBm/Ch and Tx: Min: >–5 dBm/Ch to Max: <+ 6.5dBm/Ch in order to mee

Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote on 19/01/2024 14:35: At $dayjob we're working on turning up a 100G connection with a provider. At this point, it looks like the only optic that's meets their criteria is a CFP2. sounds like metro 100G connectivity. What sort of distances are involved, and is there a

Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Shawn L via cisco-nsp
I have. They're telling me I need The pluggable optic must be DWDM 1530 to 1563 nm with QPSK modulation that fits 50Ghz (~31 to 35Gbaud) and a launch power of ZR+ 0dBm. The customer channel should have Rx: Max <-10 dBm/Ch and Tx: Min: >–5 dBm/Ch to Max: <+ 6.5dBm/Ch in order to meet the GOSNR mar

Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Nathan Lannine via cisco-nsp
> > > Everything we have uses the QSFP28 form factor, and there doesn't seem to > be any optics on the market yet with that form factor that is going to > work, though there should be some coming out in the second quarter. > > At this point, we'd like to turn the service up sooner that later, so we

[c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Shawn L via cisco-nsp
At $dayjob we're working on turning up a 100G connection with a provider. At this point, it looks like the only optic that's meets their criteria is a CFP2. Unfortunately, we don't have any equipment that supports those. Everything we have uses the QSFP28 form factor, and there doesn't seem to be