My script... (sorry for the portuguese language)
You need to execute the command file prompt quiet at configure terminal
before running the script.
It send the running-configuration to a server (can be TFTP, FTP, SCP,
etc...) every time a user enters the configure terminal mode and exit. It
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:50 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
I haven't read what the rest of the guys suggested about this topic
but this is pretty easy.
A bit ironic...
I read your question and answered. I don't see
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:05 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk
wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:50 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
I haven't read what the rest of the guys suggested about this
topic but this is pretty easy.
A
On 18/01/12 14:26, Peter Rathlev wrote:
My own experience is that there is no easy way of detecting a real
configuration change. You can only compare two copies of the
configuration, and since some things (e.g. ntp clock-period and
timestamps) change more or less by themselves, you cannot even
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:05 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk
wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:50 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
I haven't read what the rest of
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:37 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
My own experience is that there is no easy way of detecting a real
configuration change. You can only compare two copies of the
configuration, and since some
There is a feature configured with parser config cache interface, that
caches interface configuration. On a Cat6k5 w/ Sup720 it reduces time to
generate running config from 7 to ~1 sec (YMMV).
Beware of the bug CSCtd93384!
Martin
On 1/18/2012 4:31 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
And the fact that
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 17:10 +0100, Martin Komoň wrote:
There is a feature configured with parser config cache interface,
that caches interface configuration. On a Cat6k5 w/ Sup720 it reduces
time to generate running config from 7 to ~1 sec (YMMV).
Beware of the bug CSCtd93384!
Nice, that
I haven't read what the rest of the guys suggested about this topic
but this is pretty easy. Cisco is generating CONFIG_I syslog message
when running config has been changed. The verify this you can do the
following thing (on a hardware platform).
1. configure NTP master (on the local router or
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:50 +0200, Nikolay Abromov wrote:
I haven't read what the rest of the guys suggested about this topic
but this is pretty easy.
A bit ironic...
Cisco is generating CONFIG_I syslog message when running config has
been changed.
Nope. It's generated when you exit config
But when i use the CONFIG_I and enter the conf mode and exit without any
modifications the syslog pattern is generated , but in this case i did not do
any changes !
From: t...@yort.com
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:10:01 -0800
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Syslog Patterns
To: eng_m...@hotmail.com
CC
On 01/16/2012 10:13 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
But when i use the CONFIG_I and enter the conf mode and exit without
any modifications the syslog pattern is generated , but in this case
i did not do any changes !
That's just how IOS works. Nothing you can do about it.
ok , then to track configuration changes CONFIG_I is better than parser ?
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:57 +
From: p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Syslog Patterns
On 01/16/2012 10:13 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
But when i use the CONFIG_I
On (2012-01-16 13:13 +0200), Mohammad Khalil wrote:
ok , then to track configuration changes CONFIG_I is better than parser ?
Why not combine it, if you have CONFIG_I and in preceeding lines you see
PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD before you see another CONFIG_I you can
conclusively state if
On 16/01/2012 11:13, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
ok , then to track configuration changes CONFIG_I is better than parser ?
if you want to track configuration changes, why not use tacacs+? You can
get a free server on:
http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
This will handle login authentication, login
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 13:18 +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2012-01-16 13:13 +0200), Mohammad Khalil wrote:
ok , then to track configuration changes CONFIG_I is better than
parser ?
Why not combine it, if you have CONFIG_I and in preceeding lines you
see PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD before you
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote:
what is better between tracking configuration changes CONFIG_I or
PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD?
For detecting config changes (like to re-sync rancid), use CONFIG_I.
That's AKA SYS-5-CONFIG_I.
PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD
hi all
what is better between tracking configuration changes CONFIG_I or
PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
18 matches
Mail list logo
