Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-24 Thread Satish Patel
James, Thanks for wonderful explanation.. now it’s much clear in my mind how to hand it better way, I had multiple subnets which I summarized and make it single line rule ;) thanks for that tip. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 22, 2019, at 5:22 AM, James Bensley wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Mar

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-22 Thread James Bensley
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 19:14, Satish Patel wrote: > > Thanks for clarification, i have noticed when i add 1 rules number > bump +1 but i believe you can't go above 510 right? that is hard limit > if i am not wrong. > > also changing in resource required reload. Hi Satish, I don't know this

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Please check the config guide. I am not as familiar w/the 1st gen switches as 2nd gen, but there should be at least some level of reconfigurability of the regions in gen 1. So you may be able to size up the region you want by removing entries from some other region. Yes,

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-20 Thread Satish Patel
Thanks for clarification, i have noticed when i add 1 rules number bump +1 but i believe you can't go above 510 right? that is hard limit if i am not wrong. also changing in resource required reload. On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:07 PM Tim Stevenson (tstevens) wrote: > > Yes, ACL lines consume

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Yes, ACL lines consume space in the TCAM. TCAM can be recarved according to the features in use/required. As long as the policy fits in the available TCAM space for that feature (software will complain and fail your config if it won't), enforcement is at full rate, no

[c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-20 Thread Satish Patel
Folks and ( Tim/Nick ) I have Cisco Nexus 9396 L3 switch and running bunch of ACL ( IPv4 Access-list to block certain traffic ) today i was reading about TCAM and when i look at switch i found following utilization, so trying to understand how ACL relationship with TCAM. - Does number of ACL

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM Utilization

2017-04-19 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 09:16 +, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > Actually my customer wants to use the latest release in the train  This is something one should recommend to competitors. ;-) > We found a command : > show platform hardware fed switch 1 fwd-asic resource tcam > utilization Nice,

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM Utilization

2017-04-19 Thread Mohammad Khalil
nesday, April 19, 2017 11:49 AM To: Mohammad Khalil Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TCAM Utilization On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 11:43 +, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > I have Cisco 3650 switch with Denali version 16.03.03 > > I cannot find the command show platform tcam utili

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM Utilization

2017-04-19 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 11:43 +, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > I have Cisco 3650 switch with Denali version 16.03.03 > > I cannot find the command show platform tcam utilization asic all , > anyone aware of the equivalent ? I tried "upgrading" a 3650 to 16.3.3 and I can also not find any equivalent

[c-nsp] TCAM Utilization

2017-04-17 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi all I have Cisco 3650 switch with Denali version 16.03.03 I cannot find the command show platform tcam utilization asic all , anyone aware of the equivalent ? Thanks in advance BR, Mohammad ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net