James,
Thanks for wonderful explanation.. now it’s much clear in my mind how to hand
it better way, I had multiple subnets which I summarized and make it single
line rule ;) thanks for that tip.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 5:22 AM, James Bensley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Mar
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 19:14, Satish Patel wrote:
>
> Thanks for clarification, i have noticed when i add 1 rules number
> bump +1 but i believe you can't go above 510 right? that is hard limit
> if i am not wrong.
>
> also changing in resource required reload.
Hi Satish,
I don't know this platf
--- Begin Message ---
Please check the config guide. I am not as familiar w/the 1st gen switches as
2nd gen, but there should be at least some level of reconfigurability of the
regions in gen 1. So you may be able to size up the region you want by removing
entries from some other region.
Yes, r
Thanks for clarification, i have noticed when i add 1 rules number
bump +1 but i believe you can't go above 510 right? that is hard limit
if i am not wrong.
also changing in resource required reload.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:07 PM Tim Stevenson (tstevens)
wrote:
>
> Yes, ACL lines consume spac
--- Begin Message ---
Yes, ACL lines consume space in the TCAM. TCAM can be recarved according to the
features in use/required.
As long as the policy fits in the available TCAM space for that feature
(software will complain and fail your config if it won't), enforcement is at
full rate, no per
Folks and ( Tim/Nick )
I have Cisco Nexus 9396 L3 switch and running bunch of ACL ( IPv4
Access-list to block certain traffic ) today i was reading about TCAM
and when i look at switch i found following utilization, so trying to
understand how ACL relationship with TCAM.
- Does number of ACL imp