Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-08 Thread Ɓukasz Bromirski
TCIS List Acct wrote: >> Yes on a vlan or port you can allow/deny tcp/ip traffic. See the docs >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps5528/products_ >> configuration_guide_chapter09186a008081da63.html > Does this same feature (per port IP ACLs on a L2 interface) work on the 2

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-06 Thread TCIS List Acct
Tom Zingale (tomz) wrote: > Yes on a vlan or port you can allow/deny tcp/ip traffic. See the docs > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps5528/products_ > configuration_guide_chapter09186a008081da63.html > Does this same feature (per port IP ACLs on a L2 interface) work on t

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-06 Thread John Kougoulos
I think that at least on 3550 you couldn't apply concurrently port acls (on layer 2 ports) and vlan acls (on Layer 3 ports/SVIs). I'm not sure if this restriction applies on 3560 too. Tom Zingale (tomz) wrote: > Yes on a vlan or port you can allow/deny tcp/ip traffic. See the docs > http://www.ci

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-05 Thread sthaug
> So I can apply an ACL on a Layer2 port, that allows/denies TCP/IP traffic? I > know I can do this on some Foundry switches, but have never tried on a 35xx > when > the port is not a L3 port.. I did this several years ago with 3550 switches at my previous employer. Worked just fine (though it

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-05 Thread TCIS List Acct
Tom Zingale (tomz) wrote: > Yes on a vlan or port you can allow/deny tcp/ip traffic. See the docs > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps5528/products_ > configuration_guide_chapter09186a008081da63.html > Thanks, that link answers most of my questions. Performance wise, it

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-05 Thread Tom Zingale \(tomz\)
ECTED] On Behalf Of TCIS List Acct > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:19 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs? > > > > Tom Zingale (tomz) wrote: > > Yes the SMI software feature set supports ACL's on a per port basis &

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-05 Thread TCIS List Acct
Tom Zingale (tomz) wrote: > Yes the SMI software feature set supports ACL's on a per port basis > So I can apply an ACL on a Layer2 port, that allows/denies TCP/IP traffic? I know I can do this on some Foundry switches, but have never tried on a 35xx when the port is not a L3 port.. --Mike

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-05 Thread Tom Zingale \(tomz\)
Yes the SMI software feature set supports ACL's on a per port basis > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TCIS List Acct > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:46 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [

[c-nsp] WS-C3560G-48TS-S per port ACLs?

2007-06-05 Thread TCIS List Acct
Can the WS-C3560G-48TS-S do extended access-lists on a per-port basis when using the standard -S image? --Mike ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pi