[c-nsp] basic nat question

2009-06-04 Thread Ryan Goldberg
I really did *not* want my first post to cisco-nsp to be this lame, but... if you have second- got an 1841 out there, with x.x.x.161/29 bound on the internet facing port, and .163, .164, .165 also bound as secondaries. need to do some static nat, but only the entries for the primary IP work

Re: [c-nsp] basic nat question

2009-06-04 Thread Church, Charles
-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: [c-nsp] basic nat question I really did *not* want my first post to cisco-nsp to be this lame, but... if you have second- got an 1841 out there, with x.x.x.161/29 bound on the internet facing port, and .163, .164, .165 also bound as secondaries. need to do some

Re: [c-nsp] basic nat question

2009-06-04 Thread Ryan Goldberg
-Original Message- From: Church, Charles [mailto:cchur...@harris.com] What's the purpose of having those additional addresses bound as secondaries? It's not needed for NAT. desperate attempt to make things work I guess I really did *not* want my first post to cisco-nsp to be this