On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> (It's not proving a great platform for us TBH - I still can't get good
> Netflow performance out of a 68xx in exactly the same environments a sup720
> thrived... oh the irony)
I like the platform, I really do, but I could do without the
absolut
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Holemans Wim
wrote:
> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy25743
> C6880-X-LE: Contiguous 4 10G ports goes down and cannot be brought up
>
> As an solution the page points to 3 new software releases :
> Known Fixed Releases: (3)
> 15.2(1)SY1.118
> 1
On 07/04/16 22:15, Hunter Fuller wrote:
Look out for SY2!! We were on that release when we rolled out our
Cat6807s in 2014 but there was a gross bug where a malformed mDNS
packet could crash the sup! We had a quad-sup VSS at this time and it
crashed all four within a minute! I'm unsure if this wa
and keep in mind that most releases for the 6800 are deferred, so it would
be hard to get support from TAC on those. Only the last 1 or 2 rebuilt in
each trains are not deferred.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote:
> Look out for SY2!! We were on that release when we rolled out
Look out for SY2!! We were on that release when we rolled out our
Cat6807s in 2014 but there was a gross bug where a malformed mDNS
packet could crash the sup! We had a quad-sup VSS at this time and it
crashed all four within a minute! I'm unsure if this was VSS specific
but I did get confirmation
On 7/Apr/16 10:14, Holemans Wim wrote:
>
> As an solution the page points to 3 new software releases :
> Known Fixed Releases: (3)
> 15.2(1)SY1.118
> 15.3(1)IE101.312
> 15.4(1)IA1.22
> Of these 3 releases none is available for download ? There is even no
> 15.3 of 15.4 train availab
University of Antwerp
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Namens Aaron DuShey
Verzonden: woensdag 6 april 2016 20:40
Aan: selamat pagi
CC: cisco-nsp
Onderwerp: Re: [c-nsp] blackholed traffic on ether-channel
Sorry for the earlier misfire
Sorry for the earlier misfire.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:55 AM, selamat pagi wrote:
> Setup:
> 4 port LACP channel, C6880 <-> Nexus 7k
>
> Recently we had the issue that most (not all) traffic was black-holed on a
> C6880.
> No interface counters, nor the port-channel status, nor an NMS pointed
Aaron
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 10:55 AM, selamat pagi wrote:
>
> Setup:
> 4 port LACP channel, C6880 <-> Nexus 7k
>
> Recently we had the issue that most (not all) traffic was black-holed on a
> C6880.
> No interface counters, nor the port-channel status, nor an NMS pointed to
> any abnormal beh
>
> Setup:
> 4 port LACP channel, C6880 <-> Nexus 7k
>
> Recently we had the issue that most (not all) traffic was black-holed on a
> C6880.
> No interface counters, nor the port-channel status, nor an NMS pointed to
> any abnormal behavior.
>
> Finally, the problem was resolved by shutting down a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:55:09PM +0200, selamat pagi wrote:
> 4 port LACP channel, C6880 <-> Nexus 7k
>
> Recently we had the issue [..]
I'm sure that this can be solved by upgrading to a different un-named
OS version on either side and rebooting.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickab
Setup:
4 port LACP channel, C6880 <-> Nexus 7k
Recently we had the issue that most (not all) traffic was black-holed on a
C6880.
No interface counters, nor the port-channel status, nor an NMS pointed to
any abnormal behavior.
Finally, the problem was resolved by shutting down a specific interfa
12 matches
Mail list logo
