On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: > Mark Zipp wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm wondering if anybody has an update or any fresher opinions on the > > the following thread, regarding having to try to synchronise MST VLAN > > additions/removes on multiple devices at once to try to avoid > > impacting traffic forwarding for existing VLANs. We're about to face > > the same problem, and I'm wondering if Steinar Haug's advice to use > > Rapid PVST is still valid. I'd expect we'd be running 50 to 100 VLANs > > We use it for many more vlans than that with no problems. We use it in > preference to MST for that reason and others: including the fact that > the ciscos can only run one MST "process" so your MST cloud has to > propagate across your entire network if you are running a collapsed > core+distribution layer (as we are). > > I am frankly unimpressed with MST
Anyone has info regarding the "pre-standard" MST implementation of cisco? I've juste deployed a mixed 12.1.22 (cat2950) and 1.2.35SE (cat2960g) and "spanning-tree mst pre-standard" seemed necessary on the 2960g ports towards the 2950's. What's the difference between cisco pre-standard implementation and the standardized one? regards. -- Philippe Strauss av. de Beaulieu 25 1004 Lausanne http://philou.ch _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/