Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread JC Cockburn
;-) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:09 AM To: David Freedman Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL > How about exp

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> > >>>> Router bgp > >>>> Neighbor ttl-security hops > >>>> > >>>> ? > >>>> > >>>> Ken Matlock > >>>> Network Analyst > >>>> Exempla Healthcare > >>>> (303) 467

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Manu Chao
; > > wrote: > > > > > > > Router bgp > > > > Neighbor ttl-security hops > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > Ken Matlock > > > > Network Analyst > > > > Exempla Healthcare > > >

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread David Freedman
, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Router bgp >>>> Neighbor ttl-security hops >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>>> Ken Matlock >>>> Network Analyst >>>> Exempla Health

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> > > Exempla Healthcare > > > (303) 467-4671 > > > matlo...@exempla.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > > > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Manu Chao
I am running IS-IS :( This feature is not yet supported but it is a good option Thanks for your input On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Freedman wrote: > Manu Chao wrote: > > Oli, > > > > More detail: > > > > I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs loopbacks > with > >

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread David Freedman
Manu Chao wrote: > Oli, > > More detail: > > I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs loopbacks with > IS-IS L2 or OSPF area 0 as IGP. > > This IGP is extended to some non MPLS routers X. > > In some backbone links failure, IGP allow MP-iBGP to stay UP via X links > (non MPLS

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Manu Chao
--- > > > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > > > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Manu Chao > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:52 AM > > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > > Subject: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Marko Milivojevic
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:10, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > yes, only supported for ebgp. Would be interested about the "very > specific design" and why Manu requires this functionality? I'm not sure what Manu has in mind, but I had a need to use similar feature to prevent iBGP working over

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Manu Chao > > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:52 AM > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL > > > > For a very specific design, i need to limit TTL valu

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-14 Thread Manu Chao
; -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Manu Chao > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:52 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL > > For a very specific design, i

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-13 Thread Andrey 'sshd' Petrenko
---Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Manu Chao > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:52 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL > > For a very specific design, i need to li

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-13 Thread Matlock, Kenneth L
:52 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL For a very specific design, i need to limit TTL value in ibgp-multihop. Is it possible to limit iBGP TTL like we do with ebgp-multihop ttl command? Any input appreciated. Manu ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-13 Thread David Freedman
Can I just ask why you would want to do this? unless you are using passive/auto-peer, you need to have neighbors configured both sides to form an adjacency, the transport addresses also, surprisingly, need to be reachable :) If you are indeed doing passive/autopeer and have a /good/ reason for doi

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-13 Thread Manu Chao
timers have nothing to do with TTL ;) On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Muhammad Jawwad Paracha wrote: > neighbour timer will do the trick for you. > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Manu Chao wrote: > >> For a very specific design, i need to limit TTL value in ibgp-multihop. >> >> Is it p

Re: [c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-13 Thread Muhammad Jawwad Paracha
neighbour timer will do the trick for you. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Manu Chao wrote: > For a very specific design, i need to limit TTL value in ibgp-multihop. > > Is it possible to limit iBGP TTL like we do with ebgp-multihop ttl command? > > Any input appreciated. > > Manu > _

[c-nsp] ibgp TTL

2009-10-13 Thread Manu Chao
For a very specific design, i need to limit TTL value in ibgp-multihop. Is it possible to limit iBGP TTL like we do with ebgp-multihop ttl command? Any input appreciated. Manu ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.ne