Hi,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 05:39:43PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday 25 September 2009 11:05:43 am Tony Varriale wrote:
>
> > I'm not even recommending it until it gets much further
> > along and gets some serious field experience.
>
> Being that 'c-nsp' might be considered a fairly gener
On Friday 25 September 2009 11:05:43 am Tony Varriale wrote:
> I'm not even recommending it until it gets much further
> along and gets some serious field experience.
Being that 'c-nsp' might be considered a fairly general
representation of the "field", and it appears Modular IOS is
not gaining
it with a couple of customers and it always ended up
being a train wreck.
I'm not even recommending it until it gets much further along and
gets some serious field experience.
tv
- Original Message - From: "harbor235"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:15 AM
Su
er 24, 2009 11:15 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] modular code for the 6500
Is anyone out there using 6500 modular code? Is it stable? I have a 6509
with 720-3B, I would like
to use the modualr code but also do not want instability, any
thoughts/experiences would b
harbor235 wrote:
Is anyone out there using 6500 modular code? Is it stable? I have a 6509
with 720-3B, I would like
to use the modualr code but also do not want instability, any
thoughts/experiences would be appreciated.
If you go the modular route make sure you use the Feature Navigator to
co
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of harbor235
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:16 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] modular code for the 6500
Is anyone out there using 6500 modular code? Is it stable? I have a 6509
with 720-3B, I would like
to use the modu
Is anyone out there using 6500 modular code? Is it stable? I have a 6509
with 720-3B, I would like
to use the modualr code but also do not want instability, any
thoughts/experiences would be appreciated.
mike
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.ne
