Re: [c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

2012-12-20 Thread Hari bamsha Sapkota
Hello friend, I think it depends on the IGP metric that is working as backbone routing..! Suppose, you have lowest metric through the LSP..It should prefer over another path.. HTH.. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:31 PM, zaid wrote: > Hi > > how the forwarding will be if i have 2 parallel links betw

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> how the forwarding will be Broken Suppose you see both as valid paths for a given NH in cef i.e. load-sharing is in place -that 1/2 of the traffic is going to be lost due to missing label adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net http

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

2012-12-20 Thread Christian Meutes
On 20.12.2012, at 19:46, zaid wrote: > how the forwarding will be if i have 2 parallel links between two routers one > with mpls enable and the 2nd without mpls ? suppose to see both in cef ? > right > > one with lable and the 2nd with out label ? any reply correct. _

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

2012-12-20 Thread zaid
No,not like that I have this conncection in my core and i want to troubleshooting the link with mpls enabled. From: Gert Doering To: zaid Cc: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] m

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

2012-12-20 Thread Gert Doering
HI, On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:46:23AM -0800, zaid wrote: > how the forwarding will be if i have 2 parallel links between two routers one > with mpls enable and the 2nd without mpls ? suppose to see both in cef ? > right > > one with lable and the 2nd with out label ? any reply You're trying

[c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

2012-12-20 Thread zaid
Hi how the forwarding will be if i have 2 parallel links between two routers one with mpls enable and the 2nd without mpls ? suppose to see both in cef ? right one with lable and the 2nd with out label ? any reply BR ZH ___ cisco-nsp mailing list