Arie Vayner (avayner) schrieb:
> Gerald,
>
> This could be a good starting point:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/newmtu.html
Thx Arie. I think now that I should prefer the "mtu"+"ip mtu"
solution to the one with "mpls mtu override".
--
Gerald (ax/tc)
__
] mpls mtu / ip mtu / ospf
On one of my systems I need to have a greater Ethernet-MTU for MPLS but
at the same time this system should be able to do OSPF with some gear
that doesn't support other MTU sizes then the default of 1500.
I wonder if
!
interface fastethernet 0
mtu 1530
ip mtu
Phil Mayers schrieb:
>
>>> That's what you want - we have this on our 6500s:
>>>
>>> int vlanX
>>> mtu 9212
>>> ip mtu 9100
>>> mpls ip
>>
>> Ok, so "ip mtu" will influence OSPF but not MPLS? That would be fine
>> for me (at the moment).
>
> Yep
Nice,
Thx Phil!
--
Gerald (ax/tc)
_
>> That's what you want - we have this on our 6500s:
>>
>> int vlanX
>> mtu 9212
>> ip mtu 9100
>> mpls ip
>
> Ok, so "ip mtu" will influence OSPF but not MPLS? That would be fine
> for me (at the moment).
Yep
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-n
Phil Mayers schrieb:
> Gerald Krause wrote:
>> On one of my systems I need to have a greater Ethernet-MTU for MPLS
>
> What equipment? Some kit IIRC cannot set a lower IP MTU e.g. 3550? I
> could be wrong on that.
It's a 7200VXR/PA-FE-TX.
> Well, at the Cisco end you can:
>
> int blah
> ip os
Gerald Krause wrote:
> On one of my systems I need to have a greater Ethernet-MTU for MPLS
What equipment? Some kit IIRC cannot set a lower IP MTU e.g. 3550? I
could be wrong on that.
> but at the same time this system should be able to do OSPF with some
Well, at the Cisco end you can:
int b
On one of my systems I need to have a greater Ethernet-MTU for MPLS
but at the same time this system should be able to do OSPF with some
gear that doesn't support other MTU sizes then the default of 1500.
I wonder if
!
interface fastethernet 0
mtu 1530
ip mtu 1500
mpls ip
!
or
!
interfa
