Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-09-03 Thread Martin T
://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:14:14 + Subject: Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? From: m4rtn...@gmail.com To: darre...@outlook.com CC: c...@marenda.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Darren, I only want to be able to ping

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-09-02 Thread Andriy Bilous
:14 + Subject: Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? From: m4rtn...@gmail.com To: darre...@outlook.com CC: c...@marenda.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Darren, I only want to be able to ping from 192.168.1.0/24 to 192.168.2.0/24

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-31 Thread Martin T
from one side and echo-reply from the other. Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:09:53 +0300 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? From: m4rtn...@gmail.com To: darre...@outlook.com; c...@marenda.net

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-30 Thread Martin T
connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? Hi, I have a network setup where networks 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 are served by same router(Cisco 1841, c1841-spservicesk9-mz.124-7a.bin) and while addresses in 192.168.1.0/24 are NAT -ed to inside global address 10.10.10.1

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-30 Thread Darren O'Connor
. If you only want it one way, you could add an ACL that allows echo from one side and echo-reply from the other. Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:09:53 +0300 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? From

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-30 Thread Martin T
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? From: m4rtn...@gmail.com To: darre...@outlook.com; c...@marenda.net CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Darren, thanks for this suggestion! I can't use this solution on live equipment

[c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-28 Thread Martin T
Hi, I have a network setup where networks 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 are served by same router(Cisco 1841, c1841-spservicesk9-mz.124-7a.bin) and while addresses in 192.168.1.0/24 are NAT -ed to inside global address 10.10.10.1, the 192.168.2.0/24 network is not NAT-ed:

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-28 Thread Darren O'Connor
@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR? Hi, I have a network setup where networks 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 are served by same router(Cisco 1841, c1841-spservicesk9-mz.124-7a.bin) and while addresses in 192.168.1.0

Re: [c-nsp] separate two directly connected networks on a Cisco 1800 series ISR?

2013-08-28 Thread cnsp
What is the best approach here? Stick with this NAT solution described above? Something completely different to separate two networks behind the same router? To avoide the hide nat of your vlan5 so you can see the true src-ip, you may try to use reflexive access-lists to temporarily allow the