The software advisor for me has been broken the past few days (looking to
compare a 28xx 12.4.10C to a 12.4T release)
I can get all the way to selecting the hardware and pressing "next" and
then it just goes out to lunch. I've tried multiple browsers, multiple PCs
and no avail.
Has anyone else be
We're looking at building up some company-specific labs, and I wondered if
there was already some sort of software that could push out (and preferably
save) standardized environments to multiple lab devices?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.neth
I would love to take all my denied syslog events and summarize the attacks.
Does anyone know of open source that can do that? I am not talking about
summarizing
the log messages but for instance the attempts on port 5060, SQL injection,
etc
Mike
__
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 08:27:09 am Michael Loftis
wrote:
> Ah, sort of. With Juniper there's basically there's one
> image for each major product category -- more or less.
> So the J series has an image, the M/T another. The MX
> has it's image,...
Ummh, not quite:
- the M/MX/
g...@greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35:36AM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> > ...and a very limited subset of platforms comparing to Cisco. In terms
> > of going forward, IOS is being unified under IOS-XR umbrella (SPs),
> > NX-OS (DC) and IOS-XE (everything els
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35:36AM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> ...and a very limited subset of platforms comparing to Cisco. In terms
> of going forward, IOS is being unified under IOS-XR umbrella (SPs),
> NX-OS (DC) and IOS-XE (everything else).
Looking forward to see IOS-XE on Cisco 80
On 2010-11-16 01:27, Michael Loftis wrote:
Juniper certainly has much less of the insanity of feature levels and
release trains [...]
...and a very limited subset of platforms comparing to Cisco. In terms
of going forward, IOS is being unified under IOS-XR umbrella (SPs),
NX-OS (DC) and IOS-X
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:34:35PM +0100, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
>> I have just received notification below.
>>
>>
>> Get Ready for Software Download Enhancements on Cisco Website
>
> Enhancements, heh.
sco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:49 PM
To: Pavel Skovajsa
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Software Download Enhancements
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:34:35PM +0100, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
> I hav
Wow. This is probably going to be a nightmare for shared support providers too.
I really hope there's an 'enhancement' that helps them out, otherwise I image
they'll have to manage their customers logins somehow...
--Dan Holme
On 15 Nov 2010, at 19:34, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
> Hello all,
> I h
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Oh well. I think we'll go and buy more Vendor $J gear in the future
> - "a single OS image that runs on all their routers" (at least that's
> what I've been told).
Yeah. One for MX, one for EX2200, one for EX8k, next one for M120,
another
At 02:46 PM 11/15/2010, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
[...]
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we're pleased to announce the improvement of Software
download entitle
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:34:35PM +0100, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
> I have just received notification below.
>
>
> Get Ready for Software Download Enhancements on Cisco Website
Enhancements, heh.
Oh well. I think we'll go and buy more Vendor $J gear in the fu
On 11/15/2010 11:46, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
>
>> I have just received notification below.
>> [...]
>> To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
>> Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
>> dow
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
I have just received notification below.
[...]
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
download entitlement controls effective December 13, 2010.
I fore
Hello all,
I have just received notification below.
-pavel
Get Ready for Software Download Enhancements on Cisco Website
To improve your experience with Cisco and protect your investment in
Cisco Products, we’re pleased to announce the improvement of Software
dow
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 21:16, Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Can someone give me an advice about what software to use.
> We are current using TDP and would like to migrate to LDP in our MPLS network.
> Which release off software does support enabling off both at the same ti
Hi all.
Can someone give me an advice about what software to use.
We are current using TDP and would like to migrate to LDP in our MPLS network.
Which release off software does support enabling off both at the same time.
I've tried 5 or 6 different that supports both, but can't enable both at the
If your goal is to intentionally run different code on your two
supervisors, with a cold standby to take over in case some bug in SXH5
causes a supervisor crash, then no it's not a problem you've got it
operating as planned.
But few people do it that way, I assume you want the whole system to
be r
ailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Blackford
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:18 AM
> To: cisco-nsp mailing list
> Subject: [c-nsp] Software versioning on SUP720s
>
> I recently installed these sups and the 6748. I'm noticing that the
> activ
I recently installed these sups and the 6748. I'm noticing that the active sup
lists the IOS I'm booting up from the CF card and the in-active sup lists the
IOS on sup-bootflash. The 6748 lists the newer IOS as well.
1. Is this a problem?
2. If #1 = yes, then how must one fix the problem?
Than
Via a tac case and my account team.
Jared Mauch
On Jul 14, 2009, at 2:33 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
They are now claiming the site is fixed, but I'm asking for a RFO
and what their maint policy is on the website. If my bank c
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:16:23AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> But can I just make a recommendation to everyone here: next time you go
> out to competitive tender, specify the nature of docs & software
> availability. List "HTTP downloads without client software or plugins"
> as a mandatory
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
They are now claiming the site is fixed, but I'm asking for a RFO
and what their maint policy is on the website. If my bank can tell
me when they do maint, I would hope that Cisco can.
Where are you
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> They are now claiming the site is fixed, but I'm asking for a RFO
> and what their maint policy is on the website. If my bank can tell
> me when they do maint, I would hope that Cisco can.
Where are you asking for the RFO?
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 14:22 -0700, Scott Granados wrote:
> Lets face it, there's a trend here. It's more of this shielding the
> user from the equipment BS which wraps itself in to the company web
> front end as well.
>
> Try configuring some of the VPN hardware with out pointing and
> clicking.
The text on the page has changed to:
New enhanced features for downloading software coming soon.
Get a sneak preview here.
They are now claiming the site is fixed, but I'm asking for a RFO
and what their maint policy is on the website. If my bank can tell
me when they do m
Crypto software is not available via FTP.
Jared Mauch
On Jul 13, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Christian Koch
wrote:
I am still able to DL code via FTP , their web UI stinks anyways..
why bother?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jared Mauch
wrote:
We apologize for any inconvenience. Software Do
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 15:45 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> We apologize for any inconvenience. Software Download Area is
> unavailable at this time.
Same here.
> New enhanced features for downloading software have arrived.
> Get a sneak preview here.
That video almost made me puke when I saw it f
I am still able to DL code via FTP , their web UI stinks anyways.. why
bother?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> We apologize for any inconvenience. Software Download Area is unavailable
> at this time.
>
>
> New enhanced features for downloading software have arrived.
> Get
We apologize for any inconvenience. Software Download Area is
unavailable at this time.
New enhanced features for downloading software have arrived.
Get a sneak preview here.
If you are receiving an Error while downloading software and used a
home address in your profile, please provide yo
Aperture Vista is a product to add to your list for consideration;
we're using it for all space/rack allocations, power allocations, and
cable plant management across all of our managed data centers.
http://www.aperture.com/
-Eric
Nathan Lee wrote:
Hello All,
We're in the process of re-eva
Hello All,
We're in the process of re-evaluating how we manage our physical layer
information (e.g. wallport location and numbers, patch panel <-->
switchport information, fiber installations, etc...). We have close to
30,000 wallports and over 1000 fiber installations. Are there any
recommendatio
Hi,
I'm hoping someone might be able to atleast lead me in the right
direction about this. Its an old unit, we don't have support on it due
to how expensive it is (I could buy a few units for the software price
alone). If there are any hints about what might be causing it, atleast
it'll b
& Sons
Ext: 6655
Tel: +44 (0)1355 270655
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wiseman-dairies.co.uk
159 Glasgow Road, East Kilbride, Glasgow, G74 4PA
"Peter Nyamukusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/12/2007 10:43
To
cc
Subject
[c-nsp] Software Advisor Error
Hi
Hi Folks,
I dont know if any of you have tried using the Cisco software advisor site
lately
I get the following error when I am searching for software features for any
of their routers
Please wait while Software Advisor processes your request
VelocityViewServlet : Error processing the templat
36 matches
Mail list logo
