Robert
It’s likely two parallel link in the same line card
connected to my peer
Zaid
--- On Tue, 8/23/11, harbor235 wrote:
From: harbor235
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] two bgp sesion on one router
To: rob...@raszuk.net
Cc: "zaidoon h" , cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Tuesday, Augus
Robert,
That's why I replied it depends, I wanted to ensure Zaidoon was aware of
scenarios
where it was appropriate.
Mike
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Well of course.
>
> But I assumed that the question is about connecting the given pair of
> ASBRs over parallel phys
Depends, if the two ISP peers were located at two different POPs and your
layer one connectivity
was diverse this would help your AS in more failure scenarios than a single
threaded design. Of course
I would also diversify the connections onto different linecards/slots as
well.
Mike
On Tue, Aug
Well of course.
But I assumed that the question is about connecting the given pair of
ASBRs over parallel physical links between them.
R,
> Depends, if the two ISP peers were located at two different POPs and your
> layer one connectivity
> was diverse this would help your AS in more failure sce
Hi zaidoon,
Nope - I would not recommend that.
Your better choice is to peer between loopbacks and use
disable-connected-check knob or BGP multihop.
Two sessions will cause you to get the same paths two times wasting a
bit of control plane memory and CPU inbound processing - but that's
about it.
Is it recommended to terminate
two bgp session on 12000 xr that peering with the same isp on the same router
how
to handle full routing table ? Any clues
Zaid
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
