[cisco-voip] UCCX 10.5 and CUCM 8.6(4)SU4

Hi guys, I'd recently verified on the old style UCCX compatibility matrix that latest UCCX supported integration with CUCM 8.6(4) SU4 I notice the compatibility matrix has now been updated to docwiki format, and it looks like CUCM 8.6 support has been removed from 10.0 and 10.5 Seems others

[cisco-voip] granat...@libero.it

http://blogs.tedcromwell.com/xqo/zegovutnjbaoykz.ykwmfiowhnqyevsbfoytkrsynual___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.5 and CUCM 8.6(4)SU4

Hi Tim, CUCM 8.6(4)SU4 was originally supported with 10.0 and 10.5 but was pulled due to compatibility issues around CSCud68560. While Andrew is correct that we released a fix for 10.0 compatibility in an ES on top of 9.0(2)SU1 and 10.0(1) support is natively in UCCX 10.0(1), SU1 and 10.5,

[cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.0.3 to 8.6

I have to move from an MCS to UCS in VMware and wondered if I could cut some steps using Cobras. I could build same version in VMware with the same IP address then DRS , change IP address then upgrade to 8.6. With Cobras I should be able to build 8.6 with new IP address on UCS and then

[cisco-voip] Cisco SX20 Telepresence echo issue

Afternoon all, We have recently seen an issue with a Cisco SX20 telepresence device in one of our remote sites, where the person being called from it (called party) can hear themselves when they speak. An echo if you like. We have the same device in other sites and have not encountered this

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco SX20 Telepresence echo issue

What input and output sources are being used with the SX20 and what version of software is it using? -Ryan On Jun 30, 2014, at 11:47 AM, James Dust james.d...@charles-stanley.co.ukmailto:james.d...@charles-stanley.co.uk wrote: Afternoon all, We have recently seen an issue with a Cisco SX20

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco SX20 Telepresence echo issue

Also, what's different about this device? Have you confirmed with the customer that this is the only device that's facing the problem. If the call in made to the device instead of from it, does the other side still see the issue? Sreekanth On 30 June 2014 22:21, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.0.3 to 8.6

Hi Mike, Just to understand, what are you trying to gain by using COBRAS? Maybe a phased migration of users? Why not just the straight DRS server replacement method below? You would only have a small window between when you take backup and when you get restored version online where voicemails