Re: [cisco-voip] Forked Audio

We currently use both verint and higher ground. The latter is using both a span port and built in bridge (two separate installs). Verint is expensive and is frustrating to support since they love using Java. But it works. Higher ground easy to install and support but it depends on a thick client.

Re: [cisco-voip] Forked Audio

Scott, while I did not work on that particular part of the engagement, a previous customer of mine used Telstrat. The phones were 79xx series running SIP firmware, and it also supported secure recording of SRTP streams. However, I can offer no comment or pros/cons of the software - other than that

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

Thanks James. Best Regards Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman Senior Network Engineer - BMB KSA On Jun 12, 2015, at 7:32 PM, James Buchanan mailto:james.buchan...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, The split cert is optional. Your certs should continue working normally. Thanks, James On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6

[cisco-voip] Forked Audio

Our Current call recording vendor just told me they only support SCCP phones. is anyone else using a Forked audio call recording server that supports SIP and Built in Bridge? we are migrating to 8861's which are SIP phones. What Vendors are you using and do you have the pro's and con's you would

Re: [cisco-voip] Lead Second

Document released today on cisco.com regarding UC Applications impacted by the June 30th Leap Second: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/119036-technote-vos-00.html -Matt On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Wes

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 tomcat virtual memory issues?

We are having issues with it on CUC 10.5.1, and TAC tells us it's a false alert and we can ignore it. They have no plans to fix it. If anyone wants more details, I can give it to you and/or a TAC case number. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Erick Bergquist wrote: > Yep, around 2G here to. I

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS c220 SFF unable to access CIMC

Can you reach the default gateway for that subnet from other network? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter] [chat][Phone][video] "Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.pr

[cisco-voip] OS Certificate page - Unmapped Exception Nuill on CUC 10.5.2

Anyone know of fix for getting "Unmapped Exception Null" when listing Certificates on unity connection security certificate management page? Found a few bugs for this in earlier versions for other parts in the configuration but not the certificate management page. CUC version 10.5.2.1-5 Eric

[cisco-voip] Please remove me from this

Greg W Solutions Engineer This message w/attachments (message) is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy al

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS c220 SFF unable to access CIMC

Is the https/ssh to the CIMC or vSphere or some application that is guest? Sound like maybe a host update (does the UEFI/BIOS, Controller, NICs etc) to fix a bug if CIMC. The CIMC has a dedicated NIC, are you using that? Normally I won’t do a trunk port to the CIMC, but switchport mode access.

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

Hello, The split cert is optional. Your certs should continue working normally. Thanks, James On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman < ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com> wrote: > Thanks James/Tim for all your valuable feedback. > > One last question, regarding the Split Certificate intro

[cisco-voip] UCS c220 SFF unable to access CIMC

  Thanks to all who investigate this issue or post advise. We have a UCS c220 and while the configuration by our reseller seemed to be solid we are unable to telnet, SSH, or access via browser HTTPS (unless we are on the same exact subnet and connected via Ethernet to the switchport) the UCS bo

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 tomcat virtual memory issues?

Yep, around 2G here to. I had increased the trigger on the alert by a bit earlier but now it is tripping again quite often. Looks to be slowly increasing over time so I'm leaning toward a leak. Will try to restart tomcat and see if same pattern occurs when I get a chance on one of them. On Fri, J

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 tomcat virtual memory issues?

We've been seeing pretty high memory utilization for 10.5 as well. It stays pretty constant around 2GB. We're thinking about increasing the RAM for some of these at it looks like 2GB is the new normal for tomcat. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Erick Bergquist wrote: > Is anyone aware of any

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 tomcat virtual memory issues?

I'm not sure of a bug, but I do know in 11.0 they are increasing the memory requirements for all CUCM VMs because of increased memory usage over time. Could possibly just be a tuning issue with the alert settings. -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nethe

[cisco-voip] 10.5.2 tomcat virtual memory issues?

Is anyone aware of any tomcat virtual memory issues in 10.5.2 SU1 or maybe a tomcat memory leak? We're getting RTMT alerts about low virtual memory on different 10.5 clusters since updating them from 8.x or 9.x. The VMs have 4 gig memory from prior version OVA and the CPU/memory on VM matches curr

Re: [cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

I should also add this is intermittent. Sometimes Jabber will connection to Unity Connection just fine with SSO. Sometimes it will try to connect to the DNS servers (Show Connection Status shows the DNS server as voicemail) and fail. Sometimes it will try to connect to Unity Connection but witho

Re: [cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

It seems like the problem is that for some reason, Jabber thinks the DNS server is the voicemail server. So it is performing a SSO check with the DNS server and that fails. Any idea why Jabber would be doing this ? On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Justin Steinberg wrote: > i've looked through

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx question

Thanks James/Tim for all your valuable feedback. One last question, regarding the Split Certificate introduced in MR5, I already have a certificate signed from a public CA and it's working fine (my current version is 2.5 base release), so after updating to MR5 with Split Certificate do I have t