The command showed me the box that was changed.
Thanks for the info
From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 4:34 PM
To: Norm Nicholson
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
Ot
Other option would be it's under the transfer options. Try this one to
find those:
run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select transfer.extension,handler.displayname
from tbl_transferoption as transfer left join tbl_handler as handler on
transfer.callhandlerobjectid = handler.objectid where transfer.extens
Actually this query will get you both number and the user/callhandler it's
on:
run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select num.transfernumber, handler.displayname
from tbl_alternatecontactnumber as num left join tbl_menuentry as menu on
num.menuentryobjectid = menu.objectid left join tbl_handler as handler
Sounds like alternate number to me.
If they haven't deleted it, try running this from the Unity Connection
publisher:
run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select * from tbl_alternatecontactnumber where
transfernumber like '9%'
That will show all alternate contact numbers beginning with 9 and then we
can f
All to the same number in St Kitts.
Norm Nicholson
Telecom Analyst
City of Kitchener
(519)741.2200 x7000
From: Brian Meade
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:47 PM
To: Norm Nicholson
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
Was it all the same destinati
Was it all the same destination number or different numbers? Manually
added alternate contacts bypass the restriction tables I believe.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
>
>
> I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance
> one evening. The restrict tables were
I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance one
evening. The restrict tables were correct but I found the ports on voicemail
had the LD calling search space and removed it, and the LD stopped. Any idea
how they can dial 9 , is it from the main call processor or is i
Definitely a valid point on ECM - it can help with a few errors detected on
transmitted page, but consistent errors will simply cause ECM to retransmit
again, and again, until the fax fails, redials, detects more errors and repeats
the retransmissions, fax failure, redial, repeat again, etc.
Ad
Hi Adam,
Using latest 10.6 version with LDAP integration just fine (without SSL).
Cheers,
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Pawlowski, Adam
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 4:50 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [
My experince is that analog faxing over SIP is sometimes a dance.
What I have found to work consistently is to disable SuperG3 and ECM on the fax
modem and restrict the rx/tx of the modem to 14.4 Kbps.
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
From: "Haas, Neal"
Sent: Wednesday, August
Does anyone know if you can integrate prime collab assurance with Active
Directory? All I get out of the application is "Error connecting to LDAP" no
matter what I try to get it to do. I don't see any place for certificate
acceptance for LDAPS in this application either, but there is certainly a
We tried to put our faxes all on SIP, best solution was to move 200 DID's back
to PRI, sad day...
Thank you,
Neal Haas
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 5:52 AM
To: norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip
I personally can't speak to 3rd party FXS gateways, but I've worked with
customers in the past whose VG224s were integrated w/ CUCM via SIP trunk. The
two caveats that immediately come to mind are applicable to a non-Cisco FXS
gateway using SIP as well:
1) Lack of SCCP supplementary servi
13 matches
Mail list logo
