Thanks everyone
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:56 PM, NateCCIE wrote:
> Yep, it will work just like that.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:15 PM
> *To:* Cisco VOIP
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Que
Yep, it will work just like that.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed
Leatherman
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:15 PM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] Question about Local Route Group feature
Hello!
I actually haven't had to make signifi
“If a device pool doesn't have anything setup for Standard Local Route Group,
when someone from that pool calls a route pattern referencing this Route List
will it just smoothly go to option #2 or is there some gotcha i'm not grasping?”
Yes - CUCM attempts to get information on the SLRG once the
Hello!
I actually haven't had to make significant dial plan/gateway changes since
local route group feature got introduced, starting to plan some bigger
changes and think this might be a good tool for me to use.
Right now i'm thinking migration strategies for moving folks onto SIP trunk
from PRI.
