Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM losing access to NTP for extended period

Oh no! Cats and dogs living together!!! Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) > wrote: > > https://youtu.be/O3ZOKDmorj0 > > -Ryan > > On Nov 6, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Ed Leatherman wrote: > > Forwarding this to the

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

This thread is so much fun I thought i'd resurrect it again! I'm toying around with MRA again, as we have a significant segment of our campus that has their hosts all NATed off from the rest of campus/world and their firewalls aren't playing well with SIP. As I don't have a ready mechanism to do

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

I should have also mentioned that using Device Pools and local route groups is not a good fit here... we use extension mobility. Since the EM profiles do not have a device pool, they use the settings from the hotel phone. That's why I came up with the option of using a CSS on the line, that

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

Nick, I’ve never done it myself but according to http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/inbound-hdr-for-outbound.html you can use inbound leg headers for outbound dial-peer matching. -Ryan On Nov 6, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Barnett, Nick

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

Thanks for that, it looks promising… It looks like I may need to upgrade to 15.4 (I’m on 15.3 right now, with CUBE 9.5.1). I guess I need to look into what this means for me, as I think going to 15.4 brings CUBE 10 if I’m not mistaken… I don’t want to have to go through A2Q again ☺ I’m

[cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

I'm looking for some advice on how people handle situations with multiple sip carriers. We have a mix throughout our company of DNs ported from 2 different sip providers. If only the first provider could have ported everything, but that didn't happen. I'm trying to NOT use a proxy as I don't

[cisco-voip] UCCX 11

Anyone have insight as to why UCCX 11 still isn't up on CCO? I know recently it's available via PUT but it's been an odd release this time around with UCCX 11. Also, anyone running this in production? ___ cisco-voip mailing list

[cisco-voip] CUCM losing access to NTP for extended period

Forwarding this to the list for Lelio: what happens if our voice servers loose access to ntp servers for a long period of time? His Internet service is down -- Ed Leatherman ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11

It's still the FCS release so historically those aren't published (for inane legal reasons that make you go, huh?) once the first SU is out you should see it. I feel like they changed this for CUCM so no idea why it hasn't been for CCX... Have NOT used it yet. Requires you to use finesse, CAD

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

Have you asked either carrier if they can remove the outbound caller ID restriction? With my carrier (PRI, not SIP, but same issue) it was basically just a matter of asking them. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Barnett, Nick Sent: November-06-15

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

I have a feeling his billing issue is precluding that from working. I'd second this outside of that. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 Facebook | Twitter |

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

Often times set providers Will allow you to mask caller ID however you choose. In cases where they do not, They should be able to remove the restriction If you ask. You may have to sign some forms in order for them to do that, If the provider services e911. A few moons ago when I work for a

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM losing access to NTP for extended period

https://youtu.be/O3ZOKDmorj0 -Ryan On Nov 6, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Ed Leatherman wrote: Forwarding this to the list for Lelio: what happens if our voice servers loose access to ntp servers for a long period of time? His Internet service is down -- Ed Leatherman

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

I should probably further explain; we would originate all calls through one carrier (the less expensive one) and terminate all calls from both carriers. We would use HSRP In cases where there were outages from the primary link. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

I should probably further explain; we would originate all calls through one carrier (the less expensive one) and terminate all calls from both carriers. We would use HSRP In cases where there were outages from the primary link. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

I should stop using speech to text ... TERMINATE calls through one carrier and accept origination from both. Original message From: Ryan Huff Date:11/06/2015 5:05 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Norton, Mike" ,"Barnett, Nick" ,cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] solution