I need to send a call out an FXO port that does not have talk battery or
dialtone on the other end. Normally an FXO port will notice the lack of talk
battery and the call will fail. Is there a way to configure the FXO port to not
check for talk battery? This is on a 2900 running 15.3M.
--
Mike
I just want to ask why? The situation you're talking about makes me think of
end stations, in which case you'd want to have an FXS port, not an FXO
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Norton, Mike
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:52 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether
A station port would need to supply talk battery to the station, so yes that
would need FXS, but no that's not what I want.
Basically I was trying to get a dry audio output for an overhead paging system.
Kinda like you would with an E&M port, but I only have the FXO ports. The idea
was for this
That's interesting. All the paging systems I've hooked up in the past I've done
via a paging adapter off an FXS port.
Either way, looks like you'll have your solution by Monday.
From: Norton, Mike [mailto:mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 4:57 PM
To: Ben Amick ; cisco-voip@puck.
Any paging systems I've come across can connect to either FXS or FXO, whichever
you configure it for. FXO is a far superior choice because of the disconnect
supervision and the ease of sending out digits to it, but it seems most paging
systems expect FXS in their default configuration.
-mn
Fro
